Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · Oklahoma

TUL

Tulsa, OK · ~51 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

TUL runs at 43% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade A.

TUL: 2.8 TCR = 43% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

TUL safety composite

TUL scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 2.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
B 3.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TUL held a steady TCR band

TUL's TCR held near 0.2 from 3.2 in 2016 to 3.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 9.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.08× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.2 · 2017=2.3 · 2018=9.9 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=6.7 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Tulsa, OK AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 2.8 · 43% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #6/76
  • PHOTO 20-20 Delivery, LLC
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 20-20 Delivery, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oklahoma employers → · Look up another →

TUL in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows TUL averages 2.8 TCR (43% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

TUL TCR series: 2016=3.2 · 2017=2.3 · 2018=9.9 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=6.7 · 2023=0 · 2024=3 · BLS 6.5

Where TUL falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oklahoma alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 76 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in Oklahoma.

TUL (51 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate TUL
TUL (51 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

TUL has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 6.7 3.3 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 9.9 7.3 15 0 0
2017 2.3 1.5 3 0 0
2016 3.2 3.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · OK · Tulsa

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,320 rated employers in Oklahoma with headcount on file · 1,004 employers in Tulsa, OK · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 20-20 Delivery, LLC 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR FedEx 271 CAYUGA DRIVE 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR PARCEL PRO INC. (CAWTN) 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR KAD Logistics LLC 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cimarron Feedyard 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cri Feeders of Guymon, LLC 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nebo 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Enid Service Center 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Francis Hospital, Inc. 6,668 FTE
CITY-NEAR H&P IDC - U.S. Land 6,014 FTE
CITY-NEAR TUL-TULSA-MAINTENANCE BASE 5,184 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-TUL-TULSA-TUL-TRML 4,794 FTE
NAT-TCR O&R Middletown 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Dunn Distribution Center Office #6011 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Frisco Store #2106 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Eagle Motor Freight Inc. 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE J & L Wood Products, Inc. 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carqueville 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clear Visions 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pasadena TX 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.