ALL printing operations including digital printing · Oklahoma

Tulsa Litho (CP Solutions)

Tulsa, OK · ~61 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tulsa Litho (CP Solutions) runs at 45% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical ALL printing operations including digital printing workplace, earning a grade A.

Tulsa Litho (CP Solutions): 1.5 TCR = 45% of ALL printing operations including digital printing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tulsa Litho (CP Solutions) safety composite

Tulsa Litho (CP Solutions) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Tulsa Litho (CP Solutions): 1.3 → 1.9 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 7.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.29× in 2022

Tulsa Litho (CP Solutions)'s TCR rose 0.6 from 1.3 in 2016 to 1.9 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 7.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 1.29× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Tulsa, OK AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 45% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #3/12
  • PHOTO Four Cents Holdings …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Four Cents Holdings LLC - DBA Hopkins Printing (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oklahoma employers → · Look up another →

Tulsa Litho (CP Solutions) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tulsa Litho (CP Solutions) averages 1.5 TCR (45% of the ALL printing operations including digital printing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tulsa Litho (CP Solutions) TCR series: 2016=1.3 · 2017=0 · 2018=7.2 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=1.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Tulsa Litho (CP Solutions) falls in its industry

2,001 ALL printing operations includ establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oklahoma alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 12 ALL printing operations includ employers in Oklahoma.

Tulsa Litho (CP Solutions) (61 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Tulsa Litho (CP Solutions)
Tulsa Litho (CP Solutions) (61 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Tulsa Litho (CP Solutions) has fewer employees than the ALL printing operations including digita median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 7.2 7.2 4 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 1.3 1.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · OK · Tulsa

2,001 ALL printing operations including digital printing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,320 rated employers in Oklahoma with headcount on file · 1,004 employers in Tulsa, OK · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Four Cents Holdings LLC - DBA Hopkins Printing 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Valley Screen Process Co., Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lantern Press Seattle 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fort Dearborn Company Louisville 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE SEABOARD FOODS LP CELL 2/4 LOADOUT 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Seminole Power Plant 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Seminole PP; EGX Gath/Trans 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE OG&E-Ardmore Service Center 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Francis Hospital, Inc. 6,668 FTE
CITY-NEAR H&P IDC - U.S. Land 6,014 FTE
CITY-NEAR TUL-TULSA-MAINTENANCE BASE 5,184 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-TUL-TULSA-TUL-TRML 4,794 FTE
NAT-TCR PCI Atlanta Scaffold 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR CH Ellis 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Elmhurst College * 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Eastern Shore 48370 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Oriskany Falls Construction 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Texas Instruments RFAB2 #1826 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eddyville Celanese. (SMRU2365) 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Seedorff Masonry Industries, Co. 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.