Canning, fish, crustacea, and molluscs · AS

Tuna Processing

Pago Pago, AS · ~2,412 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tuna Processing runs at 13% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Canning, fish, crustacea, and molluscs workplace, earning a grade A.

Tuna Processing: 0.4 TCR = 13% of Canning, fish, crustacea, and molluscs BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tuna Processing safety composite

Tuna Processing scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Tuna Processing held a steady TCR band

Tuna Processing's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.4 in 2018 to 0.4 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 0.4 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.53× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.4 · 2019=0.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311710 · Pago Pago, AS AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 13% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK P98
  • PHOTO Crystal Seas Seafood…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~2,412 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Crystal Seas Seafood LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Look up another →

Tuna Processing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tuna Processing averages 0.4 TCR (13% of the Canning, fish, crustacea, and molluscs BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tuna Processing TCR series: 2018=0.4 · 2019=0.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Tuna Processing falls in its industry

231 Canning, fish, crustacea, and establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Tuna Processing (2,412 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 114 employees and a TCR of 5.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Tuna Processing
Tuna Processing (2,412 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 114 employees and a TCR of 5.6

Tuna Processing has more employees than the Canning, fish, crustacea, and molluscs median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.4 0.2 11 0 0
2018 0.4 0.4 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311710 · AS · Pago Pago

231 Canning, fish, crustacea, and molluscs employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5 rated employers in AS with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Crystal Seas Seafood LLC 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR High Liner Foods HQ 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Starkist Samoa Co. 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Atlantic Red Crab Company LLC 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE 9095-ASHI 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hawaiian Airlines - ASHI 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Miller Insulation Co Inc Phoenix 21 FTE
NAT-TCR TowerJazz Texas 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Fire Station 2 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Carnival Supermarket 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Omaha / Lincoln, NE HVAC 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Davenport 00202 2,412 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hospital Campus 2,413 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Lincoln Electric Company - Euclid 2,413 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corporate Office 2,414 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.