Polyurethane foam products manufacturing · Mississippi

Tupelo Pouring Plant

Verona, MS · ~143 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tupelo Pouring Plant runs at 50% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Polyurethane foam products manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Tupelo Pouring Plant: 1.6 TCR = 50% of Polyurethane foam products manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tupelo Pouring Plant safety composite

Tupelo Pouring Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.9

2016→2024

Tupelo Pouring Plant injury rate improved

Tupelo Pouring Plant's TCR fell 2.9 from 5.0 in 2016 to 2.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.0 · 2017=1.4 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=1.5 · 2020=1.7 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=0.9 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=2.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326150 · Verona, MS AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 50% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #8/23
  • PHOTO Polymer Technologies…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~143 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Polymer Technologies Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

Tupelo Pouring Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tupelo Pouring Plant averages 1.6 TCR (50% of the Polyurethane foam products manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tupelo Pouring Plant TCR series: 2016=5 · 2017=1.4 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=1.5 · 2020=1.7 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=0.9 · 2023=0 · 2024=2 · BLS 3.3

Where Tupelo Pouring Plant falls in its industry

474 Polyurethane foam products man establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Mississippi alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 23 Polyurethane foam products man employers in Mississippi.

Tupelo Pouring Plant (143 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Tupelo Pouring Plant
Tupelo Pouring Plant (143 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Tupelo Pouring Plant has more employees than the Polyurethane foam products manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.0 2.0 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2021 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2020 1.7 1.7 2 0 0
2019 1.5 1.5 2 0 0
2018 1.5 1.5 2 0 0
2017 1.4 1.4 2 0 0
2016 5.0 4.3 7 0 1

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326150 · MS · Verona

474 Polyurethane foam products manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 11 employers in Verona, MS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Polymer Technologies Inc 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR MPC 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Austin Foam/Sealed Air 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Duna USA Inc. 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Operations Center MPC1087 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE R.C. Construction Co., Inc - Company Wide 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jackson 100 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE ST Engineering Halter Marine and Offshore 143 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ashley Furniture Verona Plant 247 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tecumseh tupelo 193 FTE
CITY-NEAR Elite Comfort Solutions 130 FTE
CITY-NEAR Capital Bedding, Inc. 91 FTE
NAT-TCR Oil Capital Electric, LLC 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR ABC Compounding 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR ACT Fabrication, Inc. (Houston) 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Plant IT 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE ORCHARDS 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE AWRC-Industrial FW 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fibergrate Composite Structures Incorporated 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE Associated Hardwoods, Inc. 143 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.