Distribution of electric power · California

Turlock Irrigation District

Turlock, CA · ~454 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Turlock Irrigation District runs at 398% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade F.

Turlock Irrigation District: 4.8 TCR = 398% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Turlock Irrigation District safety composite

Turlock Irrigation District scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.9

2017→2024

Turlock Irrigation District injury rate improved

Turlock Irrigation District's TCR fell 2.9 from 5.9 in 2017 to 3.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 6.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.9 · 2018=5.3 · 2019=5.7 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=3.8 · 2022=6.4 · 2023=4.2 · 2024=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Turlock, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 4.8 · 398% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #146/260
  • PHOTO 036 - Underground
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 133 inj
  • SIZE ~454 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 036 - Underground (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Turlock Irrigation District in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Turlock Irrigation District averages 4.8 TCR (398% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Turlock Irrigation District TCR series: 2017=5.9 · 2018=5.3 · 2019=5.7 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=3.8 · 2022=6.4 · 2023=4.2 · 2024=3 · BLS 1.2

Where Turlock Irrigation District falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #146 safest of 260 Distribution of electric power employers in California.

Turlock Irrigation District (454 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Turlock Irrigation District
Turlock Irrigation District (454 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Turlock Irrigation District has more employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.0 1.4 19 0 0
2023 4.2 0.7 9 10 0
2022 6.4 2.9 22 7 0
2021 3.8 0.7 12 5 0
2020 3.9 1.6 16 1 0
2019 5.7 1.5 17 9 0
2018 5.3 2.0 13 11 0
2017 5.9 1.8 25 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · CA · Turlock

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 171 employers in Turlock, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 036 - Underground 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Forest City location 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eversource - Walpole 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Westby Headquarters 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bowers Campus 454 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fox Factory 454 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 5394 454 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - SBD5 454 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4701-027 1,079 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-209 911 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - MCE1 897 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 349 779 FTE
NAT-TCR Four Points by Sheraton Richmond 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Napuck Salvage of Waupaca, LLC 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR French Ellison - Pharr 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Towlift Sewickley 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wando Welch Terminal 454 FTE
NAT-SIZE EQT Corporation - Pittsburgh 454 FTE
NAT-SIZE Piedmont Columbus Northside Hospital 454 FTE
NAT-SIZE Foodservice Nashville - 0685 454 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.