Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Turner Dairy Farms, Inc.

Pittsburgh, PA · ~206 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Turner Dairy Farms, Inc. runs at 192% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Turner Dairy Farms, Inc.: 6.3 TCR = 192% of Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Turner Dairy Farms, Inc. safety composite

Turner Dairy Farms, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Turner Dairy Farms, Inc.: 7.1 → 8.1 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 8.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.85× in 2024

Turner Dairy Farms, Inc.'s TCR rose 1.1 from 7.1 in 2016 to 8.1 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.85× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311511 · Pittsburgh, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.3 · 192% of ind

  • DART 5.4 DART
  • RANK #15/30
  • PHOTO 2453-00060351-60351M
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 93 inj
  • SIZE ~206 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 2453-00060351-60351M (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Turner Dairy Farms, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Turner Dairy Farms, Inc. averages 6.3 TCR (192% of the Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Turner Dairy Farms, Inc. TCR series: 2016=7.1 · 2018=7.2 · 2019=8.1 · 2020=5.6 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=5.3 · 2023=6.4 · 2024=8.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Turner Dairy Farms, Inc. falls in its industry

457 Milk processing (e.g., bottlin establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 30 Milk processing (e.g., bottlin employers in Pennsylvania.

Turner Dairy Farms, Inc. (206 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 140 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Turner Dairy Farms, Inc.
Turner Dairy Farms, Inc. (206 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 140 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Turner Dairy Farms, Inc. has more employees than the Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogen median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.1 5.4 15 0 0
2023 6.4 4.6 11 0 0
2022 5.3 4.6 8 0 0
2021 2.9 2.4 6 0 0
2020 5.6 5.1 11 0 0
2019 8.1 8.1 16 0 0
2018 7.2 6.2 14 0 0
2016 7.1 7.1 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311511 · PA · Pittsburgh

457 Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,170 employers in Pittsburgh, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 2453-00060351-60351M 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dean Dairy - Sharpsville 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Norman 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Saputo Dairy Foods USA 6.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE GMC Farm 2 206 FTE
STATE-SIZE Madison Industrial Services Team 206 FTE
STATE-SIZE PA - Allentown MFG - 7356 Industrial Blvd 206 FTE
STATE-SIZE Piramal Critical Care Bethlehem 206 FTE
CITY-NEAR United States Steel COrporation 15,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh- Oakland 14,135 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside (PUH) 13,900 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh-Oakland 13,208 FTE
NAT-TCR 10495 Park Ridge 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 0590 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR L. Suzio Concrete Company 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR KJ's Market #605 6.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Virginia Port Authority 206 FTE
NAT-SIZE 10320 Blossom Hill 206 FTE
NAT-SIZE 10234 Novato 206 FTE
NAT-SIZE 10231 Jamboree 206 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.