Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability · Massachusetts

Turning Point, Inc.

Newburyport, MA · ~334 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Turning Point, Inc. runs at 92% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability workplace, earning a grade C.

Turning Point, Inc.: 3.5 TCR = 92% of Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Turning Point, Inc. safety composite

Turning Point, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2019→2024

Turning Point, Inc. injury rate improved

Turning Point, Inc.'s TCR fell 0.7 from 4.1 in 2019 to 3.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 6.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=4.1 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=3.1 · 2022=6.0 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=3.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · Newburyport, MA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.5 · 92% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #11/74
  • PHOTO 581444 420427_DAVENP…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 65 inj
  • SIZE ~334 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 581444 420427_DAVENPORT 6_100 E KIMBERLY RD_WGH (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Turning Point, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Turning Point, Inc. averages 3.5 TCR (92% of the Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Turning Point, Inc. TCR series: 2019=4.1 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=3.1 · 2022=6 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=3.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Turning Point, Inc. falls in its industry

2,261 Group homes, intellectual and establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 74 Group homes, intellectual and employers in Massachusetts.

Turning Point, Inc. (334 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Turning Point, Inc.
Turning Point, Inc. (334 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Turning Point, Inc. has more employees than the Group homes, intellectual and developmen median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.4 1.0 10 3 0
2023 1.7 1.4 5 1 0
2022 6.0 3.9 20 0 0
2021 3.1 3.1 10 0 0
2020 2.7 0.9 8 1 0
2019 4.1 3.5 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · MA · Newburyport

2,261 Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 59 employers in Newburyport, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 581444 420427_DAVENPORT 6_100 E KIMBERLY RD_WGH 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Venture Inn Unit B 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR RCRS AZ MESA CORE OFFICE 1 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mosaic Beatrice 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Communication Technology Services LLC 334 FTE
STATE-SIZE Market Basket #28 334 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nizhoni Health Systems LLC 334 FTE
STATE-SIZE US115: Boston 108 - SG 333 FTE
CITY-NEAR Anna Jaques Hospital 946 FTE
CITY-NEAR BETH ISREAL DEACONESS HOSPITAL ANNA JAQUES 491 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rochester Electronics LLC 470 FTE
CITY-NEAR UFP Technologies 303 FTE
NAT-TCR Travelodge - North Platte 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Town of Highland 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Plains Logging Company 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Joseph J. Albanese, Inc. 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Voith Hydro, Inc. 334 FTE
NAT-SIZE Whittier CA FXFE-WHT 334 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1095 - Minneapolis NE 334 FTE
NAT-SIZE Port of LA, Construction & Maintenance 334 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.