Nursing homes · Michigan

Tuscola County Medical Care Community

Caro, MI · ~303 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
6.9
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tuscola County Medical Care Community runs at 106% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Nursing homes workplace, earning a grade C.

Tuscola County Medical Care Community: 6.9 TCR = 106% of Nursing homes BLS 6.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tuscola County Medical Care Community safety composite

Tuscola County Medical Care Community scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.4

2017→2024

Tuscola County Medical Care Community injury rate improved

Tuscola County Medical Care Community's TCR fell 4.4 from 6.8 in 2017 to 2.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 14.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.28× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.8 · 2018=5.4 · 2019=8.2 · 2020=14.4 · 2021=6.4 · 2022=8.5 · 2023=2.8 · 2024=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Caro, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 6.9 · 106% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #206/471
  • PHOTO Heath Village
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 111 inj
  • SIZE ~303 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Heath Village (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Tuscola County Medical Care Community in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tuscola County Medical Care Community averages 6.9 TCR (106% of the Nursing homes BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tuscola County Medical Care Community TCR series: 2017=6.8 · 2018=5.4 · 2019=8.2 · 2020=14.4 · 2021=6.4 · 2022=8.5 · 2023=2.8 · 2024=2.4 · BLS 6.5

Where Tuscola County Medical Care Community falls in its industry

15,252 Nursing homes establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #206 safest of 471 Nursing homes employers in Michigan.

Tuscola County Medical Care Community (303 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Tuscola County Medical Care Community
Tuscola County Medical Care Community (303 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Tuscola County Medical Care Community has more employees than the Nursing homes median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.4 1.9 5 1 0
2023 2.8 1.2 4 3 0
2022 8.5 8.5 20 0 0
2021 6.4 6.4 10 4 0
2020 14.4 14.4 11 24 0
2019 8.2 8.2 23 0 0
2018 5.4 4.8 17 0 0
2017 6.8 3.5 21 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · MI · Caro

15,252 Nursing homes employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 21 employers in Caro, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Heath Village 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Laurels of Salisbury 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Villa at The Bay: Petoskey OPCO, LLC 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Weirton Health Partners 6.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Masterpiece Flower Company LLC 303 FTE
STATE-SIZE Leprino Foods Co 303 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sunrise Windows 303 FTE
STATE-SIZE Detroit Chassis LLC 303 FTE
CITY-NEAR CARO PSYCHIATRIC HOSPTAL- DHHS 408 FTE
CITY-NEAR CARO REG COMM HLTH - DHHS 380 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1798 288 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1798 280 FTE
NAT-TCR TSI Titanium 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR The Laurels of Salisbury 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Columbus Homewood Suites 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Duffy Electric Boats Company 6.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE 0198 - Culver City Jefferson 303 FTE
NAT-SIZE Continental Mills Hopkinsville 303 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company 303 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - DFL4 303 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.