Tunnel construction · California

Tutor Perini and O&G Industries PL3 Stations

Sylmar, CA · ~58 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tutor Perini and O&G Industries PL3 Stations runs at 29% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Tunnel construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Tutor Perini and O&G Industries PL3 Stations: 0.8 TCR = 29% of Tunnel construction BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tutor Perini and O&G Industries PL3 Stations safety composite

Tutor Perini and O&G Industries PL3 Stations scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Tutor Perini and O&G Industries PL3 Stations: 0.0 → 3.3 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 3.3 TCR · DART/TCR 3.2× in 2024

Tutor Perini and O&G Industries PL3 Stations's TCR rose 3.3 from 0.0 in 2021 to 3.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 3.2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237990 · Sylmar, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 29% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #19/92
  • PHOTO Shell Catalysts and …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~58 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Shell Catalysts and Technologies Port Allen LA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Tutor Perini and O&G Industries PL3 Stations in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tutor Perini and O&G Industries PL3 Stations averages 0.8 TCR (29% of the Tunnel construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tutor Perini and O&G Industries PL3 Stations TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=3.3 · BLS 2.8

Where Tutor Perini and O&G Industries PL3 Stations falls in its industry

932 Tunnel construction establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 92 Tunnel construction employers in California.

Tutor Perini and O&G Industries PL3 Stations (58 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Tutor Perini and O&G Industries PL3 Stations
Tutor Perini and O&G Industries PL3 Stations (58 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Tutor Perini and O&G Industries PL3 Stations has fewer employees than the Tunnel construction median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.3 2.6 5 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237990 · CA · Sylmar

932 Tunnel construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 112 employers in Sylmar, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Shell Catalysts and Technologies Port Allen LA 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Modern Communications Systems - Company-Wide 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Louisiana Sugar Refining Gramercy LA 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Luhr Crosby LLC. 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE S & R Farm Labor Contractor 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE RANCHO DEL MAR, INC. 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Laurel Labor Services 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Juan Briones 58 FTE
CITY-NEAR Olive View-UCLA Medical Center 2,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR CRM Sylmar CA 1,331 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 405 1,319 FTE
CITY-NEAR CN Sylmar 1,270 FTE
NAT-TCR 106-George West 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Scott County Government Center 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR PowerComm Solutions, Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR The Pride Services Co Inc 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE MCF-Willow River 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE New Holland Brewing The Knickerbocker 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cook Inlet Tug and Barge, LLC 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE La Condesa 58 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.