Construction management, commercial and institutional building · Pennsylvania

Tutor Perini Building Corp. - Northeast

Philadelphia, PA · ~70 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tutor Perini Building Corp. - Northeast runs at 59% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Construction management, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade B.

Tutor Perini Building Corp. - Northeast: 1.7 TCR = 59% of Construction management, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tutor Perini Building Corp. - Northeast safety composite

Tutor Perini Building Corp. - Northeast scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.8

2016→2018

Tutor Perini Building Corp. - Northeast injury rate improved

Tutor Perini Building Corp. - Northeast's TCR fell 1.8 from 2.9 in 2016 to 1.1 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.9 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.64× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.9 · 2017=1.2 · 2018=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Philadelphia, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 59% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #68/251
  • PHOTO Boller Construction …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~70 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Boller Construction Co., Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Tutor Perini Building Corp. - Northeast in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tutor Perini Building Corp. - Northeast averages 1.7 TCR (59% of the Construction management, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tutor Perini Building Corp. - Northeast TCR series: 2016=2.9 · 2017=1.2 · 2018=1.1 · BLS 2.9

Where Tutor Perini Building Corp. - Northeast falls in its industry

4,692 Construction management, comme establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #68 safest of 251 Construction management, comme employers in Pennsylvania.

Tutor Perini Building Corp. - Northeast (70 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Tutor Perini Building Corp. - Northeast
Tutor Perini Building Corp. - Northeast (70 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Tutor Perini Building Corp. - Northeast has more employees than the Construction management, commercial and median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2017 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2016 2.9 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · PA · Philadelphia

4,692 Construction management, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,431 employers in Philadelphia, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Boller Construction Co., Inc. 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bismark Construction Company, Inc. 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Davis Constructors & Engineers,Inc 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR MDB 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Grace Ind 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clark Contractors, Inc. 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Weaver Companies, Inc. 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Seravalli, Inc. 70 FTE
CITY-NEAR FIVE BELOW INC 19,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hospital of University of Pennsylvania 13,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's Hospital of Philadelphia - Main Hospital 9,638 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia - Main Campus 9,129 FTE
NAT-TCR BASF 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Tech Blvd. 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR SER 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Nelson Tree Service LLC 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE PCUD 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE BCI Tennessee Division 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Solenis Franklin VA 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shopko Store #40 (Sioux City, IA) 70 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.