Fans, industrial and commercial-type, manufacturing · Minnesota

Twin City Fan Companies: Plymouth

Minneapolis, MN · ~193 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Twin City Fan Companies: Plymouth runs at 25% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Fans, industrial and commercial-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Twin City Fan Companies: Plymouth: 0.8 TCR = 25% of Fans, industrial and commercial-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Twin City Fan Companies: Plymouth safety composite

Twin City Fan Companies: Plymouth scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2022→2024

Twin City Fan Companies: Plymouth injury rate improved

Twin City Fan Companies: Plymouth's TCR fell 0.6 from 1.1 in 2022 to 0.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 1.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=1.1 · 2024=0.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333413 · Minneapolis, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 25% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/6
  • PHOTO Ionex Research Corpo…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~193 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ionex Research Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Twin City Fan Companies: Plymouth in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Twin City Fan Companies: Plymouth averages 0.8 TCR (25% of the Fans, industrial and commercial-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Twin City Fan Companies: Plymouth TCR series: 2022=1.1 · 2024=0.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Twin City Fan Companies: Plymouth falls in its industry

232 Fans, industrial and commercia establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 6 Fans, industrial and commercia employers in Minnesota.

Twin City Fan Companies: Plymouth (193 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Twin City Fan Companies: Plymouth
Twin City Fan Companies: Plymouth (193 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Twin City Fan Companies: Plymouth has more employees than the Fans, industrial and commercial-type, ma median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.5 0.0 1 0 0
2022 1.1 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333413 · MN · Minneapolis

232 Fans, industrial and commercial-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ionex Research Corporation 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Johnson Controls BE - KOCH Filter Corp Louisville KY - 13382 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Flow Sciences, Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Camfil Conover 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Forsman Farms 193 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kurita America - Brooklyn Park 193 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tetra Pak Processing Equipment Inc - Winsted 193 FTE
STATE-SIZE Climate By Design International 193 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR Owens Corning Foam Insulation LLC - Tallmadge 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Intel Janitorial - Chandler 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR NGAS-UT90 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Janssen Malvern 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Central Homes LLC 193 FTE
NAT-SIZE Martin'S Food Markets 6107 193 FTE
NAT-SIZE CF Corona 193 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon Retail LLC - MAB5 193 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.