Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) · Georgia

Twin Oaks Convalescent Center

Alma, GA · ~73 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Twin Oaks Convalescent Center runs at 57% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) workplace, earning a grade B.

Twin Oaks Convalescent Center: 3.7 TCR = 57% of Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Twin Oaks Convalescent Center safety composite

Twin Oaks Convalescent Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.3

2016→2023

Twin Oaks Convalescent Center injury rate improved

Twin Oaks Convalescent Center's TCR fell 5.3 from 7.0 in 2016 to 1.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 7.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.0 · 2021=2.4 · 2023=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Alma, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.7 · 57% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #54/259
  • PHOTO Virginia Beach SNF LLC
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~73 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Virginia Beach SNF LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Twin Oaks Convalescent Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Twin Oaks Convalescent Center averages 3.7 TCR (57% of the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Twin Oaks Convalescent Center TCR series: 2016=7 · 2021=2.4 · 2023=1.6 · BLS 6.5

Where Twin Oaks Convalescent Center falls in its industry

15,252 Convalescent homes or convales establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #54 safest of 259 Convalescent homes or convales employers in Georgia.

Twin Oaks Convalescent Center (73 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Twin Oaks Convalescent Center
Twin Oaks Convalescent Center (73 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Twin Oaks Convalescent Center has fewer employees than the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.6 0.0 2 0 0
2021 2.4 2.4 3 0 0
2016 7.0 3.1 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · GA · Alma

15,252 Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 13 employers in Alma, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Virginia Beach SNF LLC 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Windsor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of Alice 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Greenbriar Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 764 GETTYSBURG CENTER 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Blairsville 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cairo Research 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Olam Peanut Shelling Co. Rochelle 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Herring Farms, Inc. 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR Titan Modular Systems, INc 312 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bacon County Hospital & Health System 312 FTE
CITY-NEAR DL LEE SONS LLC 230 FTE
CITY-NEAR Beach Timber Company 111 FTE
NAT-TCR Sutton Health Care Center Ltd. Co. d/b/a Prairie Estates 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Wheeling Transportation 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Lake Country Woodworkers 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Pruitt Health Rock Hill 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE NurseCore of Ocala 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tops Frozen Distribution Center 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sullivan RHCC 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Advanced Thin Films 73 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.