Geotechnical testing laboratories or services · California

Twining, Inc. Sacramento

Sacramento, CA · ~34 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Twining, Inc. Sacramento runs at 1054% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Geotechnical testing laboratories or services workplace, earning a grade F.

Twining, Inc. Sacramento: 5.3 TCR = 1054% of Geotechnical testing laboratories or services BLS 0.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Twining, Inc. Sacramento safety composite

Twining, Inc. Sacramento scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Twining, Inc. Sacramento held a steady TCR band

Twining, Inc. Sacramento's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 22.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=22.1 · 2023=9.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541380 · Sacramento, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.3 · 1054% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #28/35
  • PHOTO Aircraft x-ray Labor…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Aircraft x-ray Laboratories (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Twining, Inc. Sacramento in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Twining, Inc. Sacramento averages 5.3 TCR (1054% of the Geotechnical testing laboratories or services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Twining, Inc. Sacramento TCR series: 2017=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=22.1 · 2023=9.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 0.5

Where Twining, Inc. Sacramento falls in its industry

232 Geotechnical testing laborator establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #28 safest of 35 Geotechnical testing laborator employers in California.

Twining, Inc. Sacramento (34 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 1.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Twining, Inc. Sacramento
Twining, Inc. Sacramento (34 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 1.0

Twining, Inc. Sacramento has fewer employees than the Geotechnical testing laboratories or ser median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 9.5 4.8 1 1 0
2022 22.1 16.6 4 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541380 · CA · Sacramento

232 Geotechnical testing laboratories or services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Aircraft x-ray Laboratories 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harbor Freight Tools- Dillon 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Winter Garden 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Protect Environmental-Flanders 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ardent Mills Yuba City 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Filice Farms, L.P. 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alexander Ranch, Inc. 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE MFarms 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR Tate Andale, LLC 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR R+L Carriers - CHI 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Monical's Pizza Vermilion 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Tioga Construction Company, Inc. 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wikoff Color Corp. - Alpharetta 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Excelsior Company Arlington 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hilton Garden Inn 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southern WV Paving 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.