Construction machinery manufacturing · Minnesota

Two Harbors Machine Shop, Inc/SERCO Loaders

Two Harbors, MN · ~84 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Two Harbors Machine Shop, Inc/SERCO Loaders runs at 338% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Construction machinery manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Two Harbors Machine Shop, Inc/SERCO Loaders: 11.2 TCR = 338% of Construction machinery manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Two Harbors Machine Shop, Inc/SERCO Loaders safety composite

Two Harbors Machine Shop, Inc/SERCO Loaders scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2023→2024

Two Harbors Machine Shop, Inc/SERCO Loaders injury rate improved

Two Harbors Machine Shop, Inc/SERCO Loaders's TCR fell 1.0 from 11.7 in 2023 to 10.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 11.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=11.7 · 2024=10.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333120 · Two Harbors, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.2 · 338% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #15/21
  • PHOTO Precision Husky Corp…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~84 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Precision Husky Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Two Harbors Machine Shop, Inc/SERCO Loaders in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Two Harbors Machine Shop, Inc/SERCO Loaders averages 11.2 TCR (338% of the Construction machinery manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Two Harbors Machine Shop, Inc/SERCO Loaders TCR series: 2023=11.7 · 2024=10.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Two Harbors Machine Shop, Inc/SERCO Loaders falls in its industry

400 Construction machinery manufac establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 21 Construction machinery manufac employers in Minnesota.

Two Harbors Machine Shop, Inc/SERCO Loaders (84 employees, TCR 11.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 87 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Two Harbors Machine Shop, Inc/SERCO Loaders
Two Harbors Machine Shop, Inc/SERCO Loaders (84 employees, TCR 11.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 87 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Two Harbors Machine Shop, Inc/SERCO Loaders has fewer employees than the Construction machinery manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.7 3.5 6 3 0
2023 11.7 3.9 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333120 · MN · Two Harbors

400 Construction machinery manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 28 employers in Two Harbors, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Precision Husky Corporation 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bobcat Doosan Wahpeton 11.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bandit Industries, Inc. - East 11.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bobcat Doosan Bismarck 11.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Newport Service Center 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Global Specialty Contractors, Inc. 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE OlympiaTech Electric 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE South Office 84 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lake County 150 FTE
CITY-NEAR Louisiana-Pacific Two Harbors 133 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lake View Hospital 123 FTE
CITY-NEAR Two Harbors Machine Shop, Inc. 93 FTE
NAT-TCR AmeriGas (Region 53) 11.2 TCR
NAT-TCR El Paso Prepared Foods, LLC 11.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Windsor Care Center of Sacramento 11.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Willamette Farms Moses Lake 11.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Nan Ya Plastics Houston 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Andara Senior Living 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant 0383 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant 169 84 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.