Digital test equipment (e.g., electronic and electrical circuits and equipment testing) manufacturing · Texas

TX-Richardson

Richardson, TX · ~50 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

TX-Richardson runs at 23% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Digital test equipment (e.g., electronic and electrical circuits and equipment testing) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

TX-Richardson: 0.8 TCR = 23% of Digital test equipment (e.g., electronic and electrical circuits and equipment testing) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

TX-Richardson safety composite

TX-Richardson scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

TX-Richardson: 0.0 → 3.1 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 3.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

TX-Richardson's TCR rose 3.1 from 0.0 in 2018 to 3.1 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334515 · Richardson, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 23% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/7
  • PHOTO Teledyne LeCroy New …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Teledyne LeCroy New York (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

TX-Richardson in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows TX-Richardson averages 0.8 TCR (23% of the Digital test equipment (e.g., electronic and electrical circuits and equipment testing) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

TX-Richardson TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=1.9 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0.3 · 2024=3.1 · BLS 3.3

Where TX-Richardson falls in its industry

125 Digital test equipment (e.g., establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 7 Digital test equipment (e.g., employers in Texas.

TX-Richardson (50 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate TX-Richardson
TX-Richardson (50 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 0.9

TX-Richardson has fewer employees than the Digital test equipment (e.g., electronic median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.1 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.3 0.0 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334515 · TX · Richardson

125 Digital test equipment (e.g., electronic and electrical circuits and equipment testing) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 220 employers in Richardson, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Teledyne LeCroy New York 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2967-CA197 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Astronics Test Systems Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Monarch Instrument 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE 1836 Farms LLC 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schwertner Farms, Inc. 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Floydada Coop Gin #1 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gulf Coast Area Office 6400 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR Safety-Kleen Systems Inc 2,858 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Richardson Medical Center 1,932 FTE
CITY-NEAR RFAB 1,309 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2636-TEXAS.RICHARDSON 1,266 FTE
NAT-TCR Abbott Labs Altavista 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Thomas Industrial Coatings Inc. & Thomas Equipment and Management 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR H.M. Kern Corporation 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Pandora Jewelry LLC 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Plumbers Supply Co - Indianapolis 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE VCSS West San Bernardino 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Air products and Chemicals Inc, Santa Fe Springs Terminal 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE J.H. Botts LLC 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.