General Medical and Surgical Hospitals · Texas

Txaus40 Ascension Seton Medical Center Austin

Austin, TX · ~2,197 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
6.1
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Txaus40 Ascension Seton Medical Center Austin runs at 81% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical General Medical and Surgical Hospitals workplace, earning a grade C.

Txaus40 Ascension Seton Medical Center Austin: 6.1 TCR = 81% of General Medical and Surgical Hospitals BLS 7.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Txaus40 Ascension Seton Medical Center Austin safety composite

Txaus40 Ascension Seton Medical Center Austin scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Txaus40 Ascension Seton Medical Center Austin: 5.8 → 6.4 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 6.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.36× in 2024

Txaus40 Ascension Seton Medical Center Austin's TCR rose 0.6 from 5.8 in 2023 to 6.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · Austin, TX AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade C · TCR 6.1 · 81% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #384/520
  • PHOTO Saint Luke's South H…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 214 inj
  • SIZE ~2,197 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Saint Luke's South Hospital (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Txaus40 Ascension Seton Medical Center Austin in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Txaus40 Ascension Seton Medical Center Austin averages 6.1 TCR (81% of the General Medical and Surgical Hospitals BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Txaus40 Ascension Seton Medical Center Austin TCR series: 2023=5.8 · 2024=6.4 · BLS 7.5

Where Txaus40 Ascension Seton Medical Center Austin falls in its industry

6,862 General Medical and Surgical H establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #384 safest of 520 General Medical and Surgical H employers in Texas.

Txaus40 Ascension Seton Medical Center Austin (2,197 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Txaus40 Ascension Seton Medical Center Austin
Txaus40 Ascension Seton Medical Center Austin (2,197 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Txaus40 Ascension Seton Medical Center Austin has more employees than the General Medical and Surgical Hospitals median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.4 2.2 120 4 0
2023 5.8 2.2 94 5 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · TX · Austin

6,862 General Medical and Surgical Hospitals employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,645 employers in Austin, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Saint Luke's South Hospital 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR EAST OHIO HOSPITAL 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR DIALSA-FRMC1-DIALYSIS-SANDUSKY 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aurora St. Lukes South Shore 6.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - DAL2 2,193 FTE
STATE-SIZE Houston Methodist West Hospital 2,191 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tyler Main Hospital 2,205 FTE
STATE-SIZE Houston Methodist The Woodlands Hospital 2,185 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ensign Services 11,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-TX-Austin-Giga Texas 8,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - US Austin 6,911 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - AST 5,272 FTE
NAT-TCR Park Place 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR DIALSA-FRMC1-DIALYSIS-SANDUSKY 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Waimp - Washington Import 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Nchig - High Point 6.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Salinas Valley Memorial Hospital 2,197 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mercy Hospital 2,197 FTE
NAT-SIZE Abbvie Inc. Irvine 2,198 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aurora West Allis Medical Center 2,195 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.