Housing, single-family, construction general contractors · California

Tyler Development Corp

Los Angeles, CA · ~47 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tyler Development Corp runs at 48% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Housing, single-family, construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

Tyler Development Corp: 1.8 TCR = 48% of Housing, single-family, construction general contractors BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tyler Development Corp safety composite

Tyler Development Corp scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2017→2024

Tyler Development Corp injury rate improved

Tyler Development Corp's TCR fell 2.1 from 2.1 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.1 · 2018=4.2 · 2019=4.0 · 2020=0.2 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=2.0 · 2023=2.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236115 · Los Angeles, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.8 · 48% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #31/178
  • PHOTO SLC-DWH-SALT LAKE CITY
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SLC-DWH-SALT LAKE CITY (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Tyler Development Corp in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tyler Development Corp averages 1.8 TCR (48% of the Housing, single-family, construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tyler Development Corp TCR series: 2017=2.1 · 2018=4.2 · 2019=4 · 2020=0.2 · 2021=0 · 2022=2 · 2023=2 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Tyler Development Corp falls in its industry

976 Housing, single-family, constr establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #31 safest of 178 Housing, single-family, constr employers in California.

Tyler Development Corp (47 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Tyler Development Corp
Tyler Development Corp (47 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Tyler Development Corp has fewer employees than the Housing, single-family, construction gen median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2022 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.2 0.2 1 0 0
2019 4.0 4.0 2 0 0
2018 4.2 4.2 2 0 0
2017 2.1 2.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236115 · CA · Los Angeles

976 Housing, single-family, construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 2,064 employers in Los Angeles, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SLC-DWH-SALT LAKE CITY 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Timberlake Cabinetry - A Division of American Woodmark 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Simplicity Homes - OR 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR DPR Construction - Orlando 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bowles Farming Company,Inc. 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ruiz Farm Labor 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fresh Valley Harvesting, LLC. 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Timothy & Viguie C.S.V. 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Live Nation Worldwide, Inc. 50,317 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Los Angeles 40,333 FTE
CITY-NEAR LADWP 11,717 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Angeles Department of Water and Power 10,346 FTE
NAT-TCR Savannah Court of Milledgeville 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR AMEREN ILLINOIS - Southern - IL Electric Ops 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR McAdams Graphics 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Orora Visual Chicago 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Centrum Valley Farms South 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE AMERI-PAC 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hudson Creek Alz 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE C.D.S. Contractors, Inc. 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.