Freezers, chest and upright household-type, manufacturing · Wisconsin

U-Line Corporation

Milwaukee, WI · ~134 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

U-Line Corporation runs at 232% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Freezers, chest and upright household-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

U-Line Corporation: 7.7 TCR = 232% of Freezers, chest and upright household-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

U-Line Corporation safety composite

U-Line Corporation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

Fatalities
C 0

Safer than 59% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.0

2016→2024

U-Line Corporation injury rate improved

U-Line Corporation's TCR fell 4.0 from 8.8 in 2016 to 4.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 12.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.16× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.8 · 2017=7.3 · 2021=12.3 · 2022=8.6 · 2023=4.1 · 2024=4.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335222 · Milwaukee, WI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.7 · 232% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK P25
  • PHOTO Viking Refrigeration…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 59 inj
  • SIZE ~134 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Viking Refrigeration Plant (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

U-Line Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows U-Line Corporation averages 7.7 TCR (232% of the Freezers, chest and upright household-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

U-Line Corporation TCR series: 2016=8.8 · 2017=7.3 · 2021=12.3 · 2022=8.6 · 2023=4.1 · 2024=4.8 · BLS 3.3

Where U-Line Corporation falls in its industry

16 Freezers, chest and upright ho establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
U-Line Corporation (134 employees, TCR 7.7) among 8 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 166 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sub-Zero Built-InViking Range, LLC - Refrigeration ProductsSupply Chain - DecaturNorcold SidneyWhirlpool CorporationNorcold GettysburgDerby Industries, LLC GalesburgNorthland CorporationU-Line Corporation
U-Line Corporation (134 employees, TCR 7.7) among 8 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 166 employees and a TCR of 4.3

U-Line Corporation has fewer employees than the Freezers, chest and upright household-ty median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.8 1.2 4 0 0
2023 4.1 0.0 4 0 0
2022 8.6 0.0 7 2 0
2021 12.3 7.9 17 0 0
2017 7.3 6.0 12 0 0
2016 8.8 5.0 15 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335222 · WI · Milwaukee

16 Freezers, chest and upright household-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 980 employers in Milwaukee, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Viking Refrigeration Plant 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Viking Range LLC - Refrigeration 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Norcold Sidney 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Norcold Gettysburg 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Corporate Office 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE Roman Electric Company, Inc. 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE Neuman Pools Inc. 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kwik Trip Dairy 769 134 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center 7,587 FTE
CITY-NEAR FROEDTERT HOSPITAL 7,328 FTE
CITY-NEAR Milwaukee Hospital 3,398 FTE
CITY-NEAR Childrens Hospital - Milw Campus 2,851 FTE
NAT-TCR City of Hendersonville 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 1419 - Portland East Washington Street 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Erie Materials Williamsport 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Meridian Assisted Living 7.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Plainfield OPS 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE Saint Sophia Health and Rehabilitation Center 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE 163520-Waterbury | CT | 163520 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE Perfection Group, Inc., Cincinnati 134 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.