Generators, motor vehicle electrical, used, merchant wholesalers · Ohio

U Pull and Pay Cincinnati

Cincinnati, OH · ~25 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

U Pull and Pay Cincinnati runs at 130% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Generators, motor vehicle electrical, used, merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade D.

U Pull and Pay Cincinnati: 2.9 TCR = 130% of Generators, motor vehicle electrical, used, merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

U Pull and Pay Cincinnati safety composite

U Pull and Pay Cincinnati scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.1

2016→2022

U Pull and Pay Cincinnati injury rate improved

U Pull and Pay Cincinnati's TCR fell 7.1 from 7.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 7.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.1 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=3.4 · 2019=3.8 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423140 · Cincinnati, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 2.9 · 130% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/10
  • PHOTO 1268 PYP Stanton
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 1268 PYP Stanton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

U Pull and Pay Cincinnati in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows U Pull and Pay Cincinnati averages 2.9 TCR (130% of the Generators, motor vehicle electrical, used, merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

U Pull and Pay Cincinnati TCR series: 2016=7.1 · 2017=0 · 2018=3.4 · 2019=3.8 · 2022=0 · BLS 2.2

Where U Pull and Pay Cincinnati falls in its industry

235 Generators, motor vehicle elec establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 10 Generators, motor vehicle elec employers in Ohio.

U Pull and Pay Cincinnati (25 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 37 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate U Pull and Pay Cincinnati
U Pull and Pay Cincinnati (25 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 37 employees and a TCR of 6.9

U Pull and Pay Cincinnati has fewer employees than the Generators, motor vehicle electrical, us median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.8 3.8 1 0 0
2018 3.4 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 7.1 3.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423140 · OH · Cincinnati

235 Generators, motor vehicle electrical, used, merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,513 employers in Cincinnati, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 1268 PYP Stanton 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kosiski Auto 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR AWI Maxi Bay City 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Perlenfein, Inc. ST 4 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rittman Orchards 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Convoy Dairy LLC 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kalmbach Swine Management 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nature Pure Farm 2 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center 17,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Operations 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain : Evendale, OH 7,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain Evendale OH 6,400 FTE
NAT-TCR Tidewater Transit-Jacksonville 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Steel Technologies Greensburg 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR McLendon Trailers, LLC 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Superior Services of Sumter LLC 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Macdermid Enthone America LLC 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Danny Sander Construction, Inc. 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tidewater Transit-Florence 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mohawk St 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.