Health maintenance organization (HMO) medical centers and clinics · Minnesota

UCare Minnesota - 500 Stinson

Minneapolis, MN · ~422 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

UCare Minnesota - 500 Stinson runs at 5% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Health maintenance organization (HMO) medical centers and clinics workplace, earning a grade A.

UCare Minnesota - 500 Stinson: 0.2 TCR = 5% of Health maintenance organization (HMO) medical centers and clinics BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

UCare Minnesota - 500 Stinson safety composite

UCare Minnesota - 500 Stinson scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 99% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 99% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

UCare Minnesota - 500 Stinson held a steady TCR band

UCare Minnesota - 500 Stinson's TCR held near 0.3 from 0.3 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 0.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.3 · 2019=0.2 · 2020=0.2 · 2021=0.5 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621491 · Minneapolis, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.2 · 5% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/25
  • PHOTO UCare Minnesota - 600
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~422 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: UCare Minnesota - 600 (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

UCare Minnesota - 500 Stinson in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows UCare Minnesota - 500 Stinson averages 0.2 TCR (5% of the Health maintenance organization (HMO) medical centers and clinics BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

UCare Minnesota - 500 Stinson TCR series: 2018=0.3 · 2019=0.2 · 2020=0.2 · 2021=0.5 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.8

Where UCare Minnesota - 500 Stinson falls in its industry

78 Health maintenance organizatio establishments

Safer than 99% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 25 Health maintenance organizatio employers in Minnesota.

UCare Minnesota - 500 Stinson (422 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 137 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate UCare Minnesota - 500 Stinson
UCare Minnesota - 500 Stinson (422 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 137 employees and a TCR of 3.6

UCare Minnesota - 500 Stinson has more employees than the Health maintenance organization (HMO) me median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.5 0.0 2 0 0
2020 0.2 0.2 1 0 0
2019 0.2 0.2 1 0 0
2018 0.3 0.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621491 · MN · Minneapolis

78 Health maintenance organization (HMO) medical centers and clinics employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR UCare Minnesota - 600 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR American Health Management Services, Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Texas Children's Health Plan 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Capital Women's Care 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Monogram Meat Snacks LLC 423 FTE
STATE-SIZE LSC Communications 423 FTE
STATE-SIZE Twin Cities 423 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1971 421 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR Primoris Field Services 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Quest Resource Management Group, LLC 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Battle Creek HQ Corporate Office 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Progress Place 0.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Aurora Medical Center Two Rivers 422 FTE
NAT-SIZE City Of Sacramento-Operations Roll-Up (120012) 422 FTE
NAT-SIZE High Life 422 FTE
NAT-SIZE Headquarters - PLANO TX 422 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.