Gasket, packing, and sealing devices manufacturing · North Carolina

Uchiyama MFG America LLC

Goldsboro, NC · ~145 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Uchiyama MFG America LLC runs at 28% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Gasket, packing, and sealing devices manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Uchiyama MFG America LLC: 0.9 TCR = 28% of Gasket, packing, and sealing devices manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Uchiyama MFG America LLC safety composite

Uchiyama MFG America LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2016→2024

Uchiyama MFG America LLC injury rate improved

Uchiyama MFG America LLC's TCR fell 0.6 from 1.3 in 2016 to 0.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 1.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.82× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.3 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=0.9 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339991 · Goldsboro, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 28% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #1/8
  • PHOTO NOLATO JABAR LLC
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~145 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NOLATO JABAR LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Uchiyama MFG America LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Uchiyama MFG America LLC averages 0.9 TCR (28% of the Gasket, packing, and sealing devices manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Uchiyama MFG America LLC TCR series: 2016=1.3 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=0.9 · 2021=0 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=0 · 2024=0.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Uchiyama MFG America LLC falls in its industry

218 Gasket, packing, and sealing d establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 8 Gasket, packing, and sealing d employers in North Carolina.

Uchiyama MFG America LLC (145 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 84 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Uchiyama MFG America LLC
Uchiyama MFG America LLC (145 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 84 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Uchiyama MFG America LLC has more employees than the Gasket, packing, and sealing devices man median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2019 1.8 1.2 3 0 0
2018 1.7 0.6 3 0 0
2016 1.3 0.9 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339991 · NC · Goldsboro

218 Gasket, packing, and sealing devices manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 145 employers in Goldsboro, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NOLATO JABAR LLC 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR John Crane Bolingbrook 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Freudenberg NOK Sealing technologies - Ashland 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR ILPEA Industries - Scottsburg Main 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE 6728-00030023-32 145 FTE
STATE-SIZE Goldsboro Milling Company 145 FTE
STATE-SIZE International Paper Lumberton 145 FTE
STATE-SIZE IPG - Colfax 145 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cherry Hospital 1,136 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Wayne - All 966 FTE
CITY-NEAR O'Berry Neuro Medical Treatment Center 566 FTE
CITY-NEAR AP Emissions 422 FTE
NAT-TCR Howmet - Winsted 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR ATS Test and Assembly Inc. (Wixom) 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Rochester 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Tintronics Industries 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE All Phase Landscape Construction, Inc. 145 FTE
NAT-SIZE JR Balsan/DBA Johnstone Supply 145 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kerotest Manufacturing Corp. Mansura, LA 145 FTE
NAT-SIZE Johnson County Health and Rehab, LLC 145 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.