Senior citizens centers · California

UCP of Sacramento and Northern California

Sacramento, CA · ~811 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

UCP of Sacramento and Northern California runs at 228% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Senior citizens centers workplace, earning a grade F.

UCP of Sacramento and Northern California: 8.7 TCR = 228% of Senior citizens centers BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

UCP of Sacramento and Northern California safety composite

UCP of Sacramento and Northern California scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
F 14.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

UCP of Sacramento and Northern California: 2.2 → 15.4 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 15.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.71× in 2024

UCP of Sacramento and Northern California's TCR rose 13.2 from 2.2 in 2019 to 15.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Sacramento, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.7 · 228% of ind

  • DART 14.8 DART
  • RANK #191/230
  • PHOTO Life Styles for the …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~811 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Life Styles for the Disabled (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

UCP of Sacramento and Northern California in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows UCP of Sacramento and Northern California averages 8.7 TCR (228% of the Senior citizens centers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

UCP of Sacramento and Northern California TCR series: 2019=2.2 · 2020=0.6 · 2022=15.3 · 2023=9.7 · 2024=15.4 · BLS 3.8

Where UCP of Sacramento and Northern California falls in its industry

1,320 Senior citizens centers establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #191 safest of 230 Senior citizens centers employers in California.

UCP of Sacramento and Northern California (811 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate UCP of Sacramento and Northern California
UCP of Sacramento and Northern California (811 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

UCP of Sacramento and Northern California has more employees than the Senior citizens centers median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 15.4 14.8 15 34 0
2023 9.7 9.7 5 23 0
2022 15.3 15.3 3 32 0
2020 0.6 0.6 2 0 0
2019 2.2 2.2 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · CA · Sacramento

1,320 Senior citizens centers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Life Styles for the Disabled 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Florida Care Properties, Inc. Florida Location 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Continuum of Colorado 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Imagine! 8.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE California Department of Transportation Facility 384 811 FTE
STATE-SIZE California Department of Transportation Facility 390 811 FTE
STATE-SIZE SFO-SAN FRANCISCO-TERMINAL 811 FTE
STATE-SIZE Yusen Logistics (Americas) Inc - Dominguez 811 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR Deblois Farm 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Snowbasin Resort Company 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 1750 Purina 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Turman Sawmill Inc. 8.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Southern Adventist University 811 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - LUK7 811 FTE
NAT-SIZE Infirmary Medical Clinics 811 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northern Dutchess Hospital 811 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.