Shipping crates, wood, manufacturing · Wisconsin

UFP Milwaukee LLC dba Pak-Rite

Milwaukee, WI · ~63 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

UFP Milwaukee LLC dba Pak-Rite runs at 190% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Shipping crates, wood, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

UFP Milwaukee LLC dba Pak-Rite: 6.3 TCR = 190% of Shipping crates, wood, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

UFP Milwaukee LLC dba Pak-Rite safety composite

UFP Milwaukee LLC dba Pak-Rite scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.3

2018→2024

UFP Milwaukee LLC dba Pak-Rite injury rate improved

UFP Milwaukee LLC dba Pak-Rite's TCR fell 11.3 from 14.4 in 2018 to 3.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 14.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=14.4 · 2019=6.4 · 2020=4.6 · 2021=2.9 · 2024=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321920 · Milwaukee, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.3 · 190% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #17/46
  • PHOTO Hinchcliff Lumber Co…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~63 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hinchcliff Lumber Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

UFP Milwaukee LLC dba Pak-Rite in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows UFP Milwaukee LLC dba Pak-Rite averages 6.3 TCR (190% of the Shipping crates, wood, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

UFP Milwaukee LLC dba Pak-Rite TCR series: 2018=14.4 · 2019=6.4 · 2020=4.6 · 2021=2.9 · 2024=3 · BLS 3.3

Where UFP Milwaukee LLC dba Pak-Rite falls in its industry

952 Shipping crates, wood, manufac establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 46 Shipping crates, wood, manufac employers in Wisconsin.

UFP Milwaukee LLC dba Pak-Rite (63 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate UFP Milwaukee LLC dba Pak-Rite
UFP Milwaukee LLC dba Pak-Rite (63 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.3

UFP Milwaukee LLC dba Pak-Rite has more employees than the Shipping crates, wood, manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.0 0.0 2 0 0
2021 2.9 1.4 1 1 0
2020 4.6 4.6 3 0 0
2019 6.4 6.4 4 0 0
2018 14.4 14.4 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321920 · WI · Milwaukee

952 Shipping crates, wood, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 980 employers in Milwaukee, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hinchcliff Lumber Company 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Haines City,FL Plant - 314 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 48Forty Plant Lacey WA - 589 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Memphis,TN - 444 6.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Insight FS - Jefferson 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Miltrim Farms Inc. 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Barron Live Haul 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clifford A Chier Resource Center 63 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center 7,587 FTE
CITY-NEAR FROEDTERT HOSPITAL 7,328 FTE
CITY-NEAR Milwaukee Hospital 3,398 FTE
CITY-NEAR Childrens Hospital - Milw Campus 2,851 FTE
NAT-TCR Stericycle - Grand Rapids, MI 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR FLG002 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Labatt San Antonio 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 50094 - Capstone UNFI Gilroy 6.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Specialty Team Plastering, Inc 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dawn Food Products - Louisville Distribution 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clay County Fair Association, Inc 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE US Mechanical, LLC - Nevada Office 63 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.