Polyurethane foam products manufacturing · Florida

UFP Technologies FL

Kissimmee, FL · ~34 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

UFP Technologies FL runs at 184% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Polyurethane foam products manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

UFP Technologies FL: 6.1 TCR = 184% of Polyurethane foam products manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

UFP Technologies FL safety composite

UFP Technologies FL scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.6

2016→2024

UFP Technologies FL injury rate improved

UFP Technologies FL's TCR fell 5.6 from 5.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 13.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.6 · 2017=11.3 · 2018=6.5 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=13.7 · 2021=4.7 · 2022=9.8 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326150 · Kissimmee, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.1 · 184% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #10/11
  • PHOTO FCG1-FOAM-GOSHEN 1
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FCG1-FOAM-GOSHEN 1 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

UFP Technologies FL in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows UFP Technologies FL averages 6.1 TCR (184% of the Polyurethane foam products manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

UFP Technologies FL TCR series: 2016=5.6 · 2017=11.3 · 2018=6.5 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=13.7 · 2021=4.7 · 2022=9.8 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where UFP Technologies FL falls in its industry

474 Polyurethane foam products man establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 11 Polyurethane foam products man employers in Florida.

UFP Technologies FL (34 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate UFP Technologies FL
UFP Technologies FL (34 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.1

UFP Technologies FL has fewer employees than the Polyurethane foam products manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 9.8 9.8 2 1 0
2021 4.7 2.4 2 0 0
2020 13.7 6.8 4 0 0
2019 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2018 6.5 6.5 2 0 0
2017 11.3 8.5 4 0 0
2016 5.6 2.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326150 · FL · Kissimmee

474 Polyurethane foam products manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 245 employers in Kissimmee, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FCG1-FOAM-GOSHEN 1 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Creative Foam - RAM 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Foamcraft Goshen 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Future Foam Inc. Plant# 8 6.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Potato F 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE POK Okeechobee Clean Energy Center 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE PFL Lauderdale Plant 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE MN8 Energy LLC - Delray Beach Office 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gaylord Palms Resort and Convention Center 1,769 FTE
CITY-NEAR OSCEOLA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 1,660 FTE
CITY-NEAR HCA Florida Osceola Hospital 1,617 FTE
CITY-NEAR SUNEAST 1,386 FTE
NAT-TCR El Sol Contracting/ES II Enterprises JV 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Advanced Performance Glass, Inc. 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Select Euro Systems, Inc. 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR S&C Electric Company Franklin 6.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hospital Pavia Santurce PIS 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Industrial Supply Company TH 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Guilford County - Register of Deeds 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Porterdale Farms Inc. 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.