Janitorial services, aircraft · New Jersey

UG2 - 171 - Stevens Institute of Technology

Hoboken, NJ · ~23 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

UG2 - 171 - Stevens Institute of Technology runs at 31% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Janitorial services, aircraft workplace, earning a grade A.

UG2 - 171 - Stevens Institute of Technology: 1.4 TCR = 31% of Janitorial services, aircraft BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

UG2 - 171 - Stevens Institute of Technology safety composite

UG2 - 171 - Stevens Institute of Technology scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

UG2 - 171 - Stevens Institute of Technology: 0.0 → 2.8 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 2.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.99× in 2018

UG2 - 171 - Stevens Institute of Technology's TCR rose 2.8 from 0.0 in 2017 to 2.8 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 1.99× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Hoboken, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 31% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #15/101
  • PHOTO SODEXO AT WKU CLEAN…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SODEXO AT WKU CLEANING (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

UG2 - 171 - Stevens Institute of Technology in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows UG2 - 171 - Stevens Institute of Technology averages 1.4 TCR (31% of the Janitorial services, aircraft BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

UG2 - 171 - Stevens Institute of Technology TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=2.8 · BLS 4.5

Where UG2 - 171 - Stevens Institute of Technology falls in its industry

4,064 Janitorial services, aircraft establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 101 Janitorial services, aircraft employers in New Jersey.

UG2 - 171 - Stevens Institute of Technology (23 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate UG2 - 171 - Stevens Institute of Technology
UG2 - 171 - Stevens Institute of Technology (23 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

UG2 - 171 - Stevens Institute of Technology has fewer employees than the Janitorial services, aircraft median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · NJ · Hoboken

4,064 Janitorial services, aircraft employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 33 employers in Hoboken, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT WKU CLEANING 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT NEBRASKA MEDICINE FIRE WATCH 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brooksville Regional Hospital - EVS 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT RIDEOUT MEMORIAL HOSP ES CA 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tractor Supply Company Store 2227 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4535-1584 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4186-04633 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Linden Bulk Transport, LLC - 4700 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Global Specialty Fulfillment : UNJ1 670 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thomson Reuters - Hoboken 599 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hoboken 351 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prime Now LLC - UNJ1 319 FTE
NAT-TCR RAH Tucson Division Office/Home Gallery 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Southland Park Gaming and Racing 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Philips Lighting Mountain Top RDC 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 2990-Physician Services Group 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE PnP Tallahassee 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Paso Robles Tank-Brown Minneapolis Tank 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hampton Inn Carol Stream 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE CSTK Philadelphia 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.