Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction · Maryland

Ultra Utilities Construction Frederick

Frederick, MD · ~28 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ultra Utilities Construction Frederick runs at 51% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction workplace, earning a grade B.

Ultra Utilities Construction Frederick: 1.4 TCR = 51% of Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ultra Utilities Construction Frederick safety composite

Ultra Utilities Construction Frederick scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.8

2023→2024

Ultra Utilities Construction Frederick injury rate improved

Ultra Utilities Construction Frederick's TCR fell 2.8 from 2.8 in 2023 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 2.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=2.8 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Frederick, MD AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.4 · 51% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/26
  • PHOTO Hot Line Constructio…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hot Line Construction Porterville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Ultra Utilities Construction Frederick in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ultra Utilities Construction Frederick averages 1.4 TCR (51% of the Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ultra Utilities Construction Frederick TCR series: 2023=2.8 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Ultra Utilities Construction Frederick falls in its industry

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communicat establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 26 Utility line (i.e., communicat employers in Maryland.

Ultra Utilities Construction Frederick (28 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Ultra Utilities Construction Frederick
Ultra Utilities Construction Frederick (28 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Ultra Utilities Construction Frederick has fewer employees than the Utility line (i.e., communication, elect median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.8 2.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · MD · Frederick

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 267 employers in Frederick, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hot Line Construction Porterville 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Division #25 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1-EMP-Billerica 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR AMERICAN ELECTRIC CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Spring and Associates Inc. 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Perryman 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ridgely 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE K. Hovnanian East Group, LLC 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR MD-03 4,250 FTE
CITY-NEAR AstraZeneca Frederick Manufacturing Center 775 FTE
CITY-NEAR AstraZeneca Frederick Manufacturing 711 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thermo Fisher Scientific Frederick, MD (BID - Executive Way) 568 FTE
NAT-TCR Riepen LLC 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Zoetis - White Hall, IL 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR MasterBrand 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Topeka Plant 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Phoenix Masonry Inc 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Griffin Beverage CO Marquette 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Powers Built Structures 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE EDM, Inc 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.