Shelters, temporary (e.g., battered women's, homeless, runaway youth) · Arizona

UMGlendale927

Glendale, AZ · ~140 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

UMGlendale927 runs at 107% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Shelters, temporary (e.g., battered women's, homeless, runaway youth) workplace, earning a grade C.

UMGlendale927: 4.0 TCR = 107% of Shelters, temporary (e.g., battered women's, homeless, runaway youth) BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

UMGlendale927 safety composite

UMGlendale927 scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 56% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2017→2023

UMGlendale927 injury rate improved

UMGlendale927's TCR fell 0.9 from 2.5 in 2017 to 1.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 6.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.5 · 2018=3.6 · 2019=6.3 · 2020=5.2 · 2021=6.8 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624221 · Glendale, AZ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 4.0 · 107% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #3/15
  • PHOTO Beck Avenue Navigati…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~140 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Beck Avenue Navigation Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

UMGlendale927 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows UMGlendale927 averages 4.0 TCR (107% of the Shelters, temporary (e.g., battered women's, homeless, runaway youth) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

UMGlendale927 TCR series: 2017=2.5 · 2018=3.6 · 2019=6.3 · 2020=5.2 · 2021=6.8 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=1.6 · BLS 3.8

Where UMGlendale927 falls in its industry

200 Shelters, temporary (e.g., bat establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 15 Shelters, temporary (e.g., bat employers in Arizona.

UMGlendale927 (140 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 90 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate UMGlendale927
UMGlendale927 (140 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 90 employees and a TCR of 4.0

UMGlendale927 has more employees than the Shelters, temporary (e.g., battered wome median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.6 1.6 2 0 0
2022 2.4 2.4 3 0 0
2021 6.8 6.8 7 0 0
2020 5.2 5.2 3 0 0
2019 6.3 6.3 7 0 0
2018 3.6 3.6 4 0 0
2017 2.5 2.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624221 · AZ · Glendale

200 Shelters, temporary (e.g., battered women's, homeless, runaway youth) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 313 employers in Glendale, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Beck Avenue Navigation Center 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR UNION RESCUE MISSION ANGELES HOUSE 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR UMHaciendaDelSol925 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Union Rescue Mission HOPE GARDENS FAMILY CENTER 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE FOUR SEASONS PRODUCE PACKING COMPANY, INC. - AZ 140 FTE
STATE-SIZE K. Hovnanian Phoenix Division, Inc Group Office / Phoenix Division 140 FTE
STATE-SIZE Younger Brothers Builder LLC 140 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oldcastle Building Envelope 140 FTE
CITY-NEAR 730 ABRAZO ARROWHEAD CAMPUS 1,429 FTE
CITY-NEAR Glendale Elementary School District 1,201 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4701-730 1,051 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-515 910 FTE
NAT-TCR The Portland Group Billerica 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Hawaii 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Unit #2443 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Unit #0260 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE K&K Veterinary Supply, Inc. 140 FTE
NAT-SIZE GMC Farm 3 140 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fraternal Health Care LLC 140 FTE
NAT-SIZE Meadowlark Harvesting, Inc 140 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.