Shelters, temporary (e.g., battered women's, homeless, runaway youth) · California

UMPleasantHill949

Pleasant Hill, CA · ~56 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

UMPleasantHill949 runs at 187% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Shelters, temporary (e.g., battered women's, homeless, runaway youth) workplace, earning a grade D.

UMPleasantHill949: 7.1 TCR = 187% of Shelters, temporary (e.g., battered women's, homeless, runaway youth) BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

UMPleasantHill949 safety composite

UMPleasantHill949 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2017→2024

UMPleasantHill949 injury rate improved

UMPleasantHill949's TCR fell 1.5 from 5.5 in 2017 to 4.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 19.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.5 · 2018=4.7 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=8.2 · 2021=19.4 · 2022=7.6 · 2023=4.9 · 2024=4.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624221 · Pleasant Hill, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.1 · 187% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #29/42
  • PHOTO Haven for Hope of Be…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Haven for Hope of Bexar County (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

UMPleasantHill949 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows UMPleasantHill949 averages 7.1 TCR (187% of the Shelters, temporary (e.g., battered women's, homeless, runaway youth) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

UMPleasantHill949 TCR series: 2017=5.5 · 2018=4.7 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=8.2 · 2021=19.4 · 2022=7.6 · 2023=4.9 · 2024=4 · BLS 3.8

Where UMPleasantHill949 falls in its industry

200 Shelters, temporary (e.g., bat establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #29 safest of 42 Shelters, temporary (e.g., bat employers in California.

UMPleasantHill949 (56 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 90 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate UMPleasantHill949
UMPleasantHill949 (56 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 90 employees and a TCR of 4.0

UMPleasantHill949 has fewer employees than the Shelters, temporary (e.g., battered wome median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.0 4.0 2 0 0
2023 4.9 4.9 4 0 0
2022 7.6 7.6 4 0 0
2021 19.4 19.4 7 0 0
2020 8.2 8.2 3 0 0
2019 2.5 2.5 0 1 0
2018 4.7 4.7 2 0 0
2017 5.5 5.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624221 · CA · Pleasant Hill

200 Shelters, temporary (e.g., battered women's, homeless, runaway youth) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 44 employers in Pleasant Hill, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Haven for Hope of Bexar County 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR UMNormaLinda980 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Goodwill Laitner 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mens Development Center 7.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wallace Brothers 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Sun Farms, Inc 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1624 Poole Blvd., Yuba City, CA 95993 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Copperhill 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0330 - Pleasant Hill 217 FTE
CITY-NEAR Concord Feed & Fuel 167 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6962-SWY-0025-0025-02941 156 FTE
CITY-NEAR SWY-0025-0025-02941 FAC-02941-PLEASANT HILL-CA 147 FTE
NAT-TCR Astor Services for Children & Families- ECP- Mt. Alvernia 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Vincent Tool Technologies Corp 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Lombardi Development Company, Inc. 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR The Beckman and Gast Co. 7.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Plaquemines Parish 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE 704KEN 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE 702BRK 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Varex Imaging, Las Vegas 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.