General medical and surgical hospitals · North Carolina

UNC Rockingham Health Care, Inc

Eden, NC · ~489 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

UNC Rockingham Health Care, Inc runs at 51% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical General medical and surgical hospitals workplace, earning a grade B.

UNC Rockingham Health Care, Inc: 3.8 TCR = 51% of General medical and surgical hospitals BLS 7.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

UNC Rockingham Health Care, Inc safety composite

UNC Rockingham Health Care, Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2018→2022

UNC Rockingham Health Care, Inc injury rate improved

UNC Rockingham Health Care, Inc's TCR fell 1.0 from 4.1 in 2018 to 3.1 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.1 · 2019=6.5 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=3.0 · 2022=3.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · Eden, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 3.8 · 51% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #53/175
  • PHOTO Holy Cross HealthPlex
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 76 inj
  • SIZE ~489 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Holy Cross HealthPlex (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

UNC Rockingham Health Care, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows UNC Rockingham Health Care, Inc averages 3.8 TCR (51% of the General medical and surgical hospitals BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

UNC Rockingham Health Care, Inc TCR series: 2018=4.1 · 2019=6.5 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=3 · 2022=3.1 · BLS 7.5

Where UNC Rockingham Health Care, Inc falls in its industry

6,862 General medical and surgical h establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #53 safest of 175 General medical and surgical h employers in North Carolina.

UNC Rockingham Health Care, Inc (489 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate UNC Rockingham Health Care, Inc
UNC Rockingham Health Care, Inc (489 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

UNC Rockingham Health Care, Inc has fewer employees than the General medical and surgical hospitals median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 3.1 0.9 8 2 0
2021 3.0 2.1 10 0 0
2020 2.3 0.8 5 9 0
2019 6.5 3.1 27 0 0
2018 4.1 2.1 26 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · NC · Eden

6,862 General medical and surgical hospitals employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 39 employers in Eden, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Holy Cross HealthPlex 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR St. Rita's Medical Center 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Christus Spohn Alice-115 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Novant Health Kernersville Medical Center 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE PCL Construction Enterprises 489 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gildan Charleston Inc: Eden DC 489 FTE
STATE-SIZE Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC. 489 FTE
STATE-SIZE Human Services Center Sunnybrook 489 FTE
CITY-NEAR UNC Rockingham Healthcare, Inc 321 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nestle Purina Petcare - Eden, NC 284 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1558 268 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1558 262 FTE
NAT-TCR Lunds & Byerlys, Prior Lake 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Stop & Shop 100866 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sylvan R Shemitz Designs LLC 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Silver Lane Elementary School 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE 2904-SAS-CO 489 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2904-SAS-MD 489 FTE
NAT-SIZE Us Foods Tampa, Fl 489 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kasai North America 489 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.