Sewer construction · Georgia

Underground Pipeline Rehabilitation, Inc.

Patterson, GA · ~20 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Underground Pipeline Rehabilitation, Inc. runs at 138% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Sewer construction workplace, earning a grade D.

Underground Pipeline Rehabilitation, Inc.: 3.9 TCR = 138% of Sewer construction BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Underground Pipeline Rehabilitation, Inc. safety composite

Underground Pipeline Rehabilitation, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−15.4

2016→2024

Underground Pipeline Rehabilitation, Inc. injury rate improved

Underground Pipeline Rehabilitation, Inc.'s TCR fell 15.4 from 15.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 15.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=15.4 · 2017=5.2 · 2018=9.5 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=4.8 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Patterson, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.9 · 138% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #26/33
  • PHOTO Big Mountain Enterpr…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Big Mountain Enterprises, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Underground Pipeline Rehabilitation, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Underground Pipeline Rehabilitation, Inc. averages 3.9 TCR (138% of the Sewer construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Underground Pipeline Rehabilitation, Inc. TCR series: 2016=15.4 · 2017=5.2 · 2018=9.5 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=4.8 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Underground Pipeline Rehabilitation, Inc. falls in its industry

1,614 Sewer construction establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #26 safest of 33 Sewer construction employers in Georgia.

Underground Pipeline Rehabilitation, Inc. (20 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Underground Pipeline Rehabilitation, Inc.
Underground Pipeline Rehabilitation, Inc. (20 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Underground Pipeline Rehabilitation, Inc. has fewer employees than the Sewer construction median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 4.8 4.8 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 9.5 0.0 2 0 0
2017 5.2 5.2 1 0 0
2016 15.4 15.4 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · GA · Patterson

1,614 Sewer construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 5 employers in Patterson, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Big Mountain Enterprises, LLC 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Webb Boring LLC 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR BS&T Construction 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cleary Construction 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cal-Maine foods St George 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lab 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE FUNSTON GIN 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pennington Seed - Seed Production Division (SPI) 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR Patterson GA Locomotive 88 FTE
CITY-NEAR Southeast Pipe Survey Inc 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR ROW Equipment, Inc. 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dixie Feedmill 19 FTE
NAT-TCR Northern Light Cancer Care 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Power Systems Division - South & Warehouse 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Ennis 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Okeechobee 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Texas - Metals 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Loyd Builders, Inc. 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Offshore International, LLC 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Molly Pitcher Highway 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.