Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing · California

Uni-Fab Industries, Inc.

Fremont, CA · ~112 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Uni-Fab Industries, Inc. runs at 223% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Uni-Fab Industries, Inc.: 7.4 TCR = 223% of Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Uni-Fab Industries, Inc. safety composite

Uni-Fab Industries, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.6

2017→2024

Uni-Fab Industries, Inc. injury rate improved

Uni-Fab Industries, Inc.'s TCR fell 11.6 from 13.5 in 2017 to 1.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 13.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=13.5 · 2019=6.2 · 2020=6.5 · 2022=8.7 · 2024=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332322 · Fremont, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.4 · 223% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #71/98
  • PHOTO Young & Bertke Air S…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 38 inj
  • SIZE ~112 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Young & Bertke Air Systems Co. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Uni-Fab Industries, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Uni-Fab Industries, Inc. averages 7.4 TCR (223% of the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Uni-Fab Industries, Inc. TCR series: 2017=13.5 · 2019=6.2 · 2020=6.5 · 2022=8.7 · 2024=1.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Uni-Fab Industries, Inc. falls in its industry

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stamp establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #71 safest of 98 Sheet metal work (except stamp employers in California.

Uni-Fab Industries, Inc. (112 employees, TCR 7.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Uni-Fab Industries, Inc.
Uni-Fab Industries, Inc. (112 employees, TCR 7.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Uni-Fab Industries, Inc. has more employees than the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.9 1.9 2 0 0
2022 8.7 8.7 13 0 0
2020 6.5 6.5 7 0 0
2019 6.2 6.2 5 0 0
2017 13.5 13.5 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332322 · CA · Fremont

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 348 employers in Fremont, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Young & Bertke Air Systems Co. 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Metal Panels, Inc 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Unarco Ohio Plant 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR New England Fabricated Metals, Inc. 7.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE DFF 112 FTE
STATE-SIZE HMB North Property 112 FTE
STATE-SIZE PULIDO AG SERVICE 112 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central City Harvesting, Inc. 112 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-CA-Fremont-45500 Fremont Blvd 21,378 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-CA-Fremont-Factory 12,707 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 517 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lam Research Corp. Fremont Campus 2,887 FTE
NAT-TCR Benton Dairy LLC 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Dempsey Uniform and Linen Supply Inc 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Villa Rosa Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 052/Cincinnati 7.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE McHenry East High School 112 FTE
NAT-SIZE Redwall,LLC 112 FTE
NAT-SIZE S05988 - Tupelo Call Center 112 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plant City FL Truss 112 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.