Adhesives (except asphalt, dental, gypsum base) manufacturing · Indiana

Uniseal Uhlhorn Facility

Evansville, IN · ~109 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Uniseal Uhlhorn Facility runs at 119% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Adhesives (except asphalt, dental, gypsum base) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Uniseal Uhlhorn Facility: 3.9 TCR = 119% of Adhesives (except asphalt, dental, gypsum base) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Uniseal Uhlhorn Facility safety composite

Uniseal Uhlhorn Facility scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Uniseal Uhlhorn Facility: 1.7 → 3.0 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 7.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.77× in 2022

Uniseal Uhlhorn Facility's TCR rose 1.3 from 1.7 in 2016 to 3.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 7.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.77× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325520 · Evansville, IN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.9 · 119% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #8/12
  • PHOTO LATICRETE Internatio…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~109 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LATICRETE International, Inc-CA (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Uniseal Uhlhorn Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Uniseal Uhlhorn Facility averages 3.9 TCR (119% of the Adhesives (except asphalt, dental, gypsum base) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Uniseal Uhlhorn Facility TCR series: 2016=1.7 · 2017=1.9 · 2018=6.5 · 2019=7.5 · 2020=1 · 2021=5.8 · 2022=3 · BLS 3.3

Where Uniseal Uhlhorn Facility falls in its industry

287 Adhesives (except asphalt, den establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 12 Adhesives (except asphalt, den employers in Indiana.

Uniseal Uhlhorn Facility (109 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Uniseal Uhlhorn Facility
Uniseal Uhlhorn Facility (109 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Uniseal Uhlhorn Facility has more employees than the Adhesives (except asphalt, dental, gypsu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 3.0 3.0 2 1 0
2021 5.8 4.9 5 1 0
2020 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2019 7.5 3.3 6 3 0
2018 6.5 5.5 4 3 0
2017 1.9 0.9 1 1 0
2016 1.7 0.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325520 · IN · Evansville

287 Adhesives (except asphalt, dental, gypsum base) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 489 employers in Evansville, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LATICRETE International, Inc-CA 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Weld-On 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR US Gypsum Torrance 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eclectic Pineville 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Muncie Svc Ctr 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE 605-NiSource-Fort Wayne IN-Operating HQ 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE Construction 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE Starcon @ BP Whiting 109 FTE
CITY-NEAR Deaconess Midtown 3,068 FTE
CITY-NEAR Berry Global - Evansville, IN (Oakley Str.) 2,486 FTE
CITY-NEAR Berry Global 2,017 FTE
CITY-NEAR NBC Merchants, LLC 1,859 FTE
NAT-TCR Wrangler Feed Yard 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR RT Park 48050 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 1067 Eau Claire 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR USI (Hastings/Rogers, MN) 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Thunderbird Senior Living 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Verona 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4795-AA-PDX-PORTLAND-PDX-TRML 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Messer Construction - Louisville, KY 109 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.