Retail · Florida

Unit #0479

Gainesville, FL · ~86 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities

The verdict

Unit #0479 runs at 89% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Retail workplace, earning a grade C.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
avg TCR · per 100 workers
3.4
industry benchmark (BLS)
13
recordable injuries tracked

Grade compares Unit #0479's OSHA Total Case Rate of 3.0 to the Retail BLS benchmark of 3.4 (89% of benchmark) across 6 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). This reflects reported recordable injuries, not an independent safety inspection -- underreporting is a known limitation of employer self-recordkeeping.

Injury rate over time

Unit #0479's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.4 industry benchmark.

-5051015 201820192020202120222023 2.13.4 Industry benchmarkUnit #0479 TCR
Total Case Rate (recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers), OSHA ITA Form 300A. Industry benchmark: BLS IIF, NAICS 452112.

Where Unit #0479 falls in its industry

5,697 Retail establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #149 safest of 434 Retail employers in Florida.

Trend analysis for Unit #0479

Between 2018 and 2023, Unit #0479's Total Case Rate improved from 10.1 to 2.1 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 79% decrease across 5 years of OSHA reporting.

The safest year on record was 2020, at a TCR of 0.0, while 2018 saw the highest rate, at 10.1, a spread of 10.1 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a wide swing relative to the establishment's overall rate, worth checking the year-by-year table below for whether a single severe year is driving the average, rather than a sustained trend.

Summed across those 6 reporting years, Unit #0479 recorded 13 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 6-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.

Verify This Employer with OSHA

The 13 injuries shown on this page for Unit #0479 are sourced from its own 6 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.

Verify on OSHA Establishment Search

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 452112 - Retail.

DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2023)

What is the DART rate formula?

DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.

1 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 95,921 hours worked = 2.09 DART

Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping

Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State

Benchmark TCR Source
Unit #0479 (this establishment) 3.01 OSHA ITA Form 300A, 6-year avg
Department stores, discount industry avg 3.40 BLS IIF, NAICS 452112
Florida state avg (all industries) 4.57 OSHA ITA, state-level rollup

Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program

Reportable Incident Timeline

Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Unit #0479 to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.

Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2022 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.9 2.6 3 0 0
2018 10.1 3.8 8 0 0

What this grade means for you

Use this grade as a relative read on Unit #0479's reported OSHA injury record, strong versus its Retail peers, but not a guarantee about any single site today.

  • At 89% of the Retail benchmark, Unit #0479 reports fewer injuries than typical peers, still worth asking how safety is managed day to day. Know your rights
  • Judge this record against the wider Retail sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
  • Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another

Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Unit #0479's safety grade?
Unit #0479 has a safety grade of C (Average Safety Record). This grade is based on their average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 3.0 compared to the BLS industry benchmark of 3.4 for Retail.
How many injuries has Unit #0479 reported?
Unit #0479 has reported 13 total injuries and 0 fatalities across 6 years of OSHA data (2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018). This data comes from mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reports.

Similar Employers

Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Florida, and by nearby establishments in Gainesville - a different peer set than the category browse links below.

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.