Emergency medical transportation services, air or ground · Ohio

United Ambulance Service of Cambridge Inc.

Cambridge, OH · ~39 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

United Ambulance Service of Cambridge Inc. runs at 206% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Emergency medical transportation services, air or ground workplace, earning a grade F.

United Ambulance Service of Cambridge Inc.: 7.8 TCR = 206% of Emergency medical transportation services, air or ground BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

United Ambulance Service of Cambridge Inc. safety composite

United Ambulance Service of Cambridge Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

United Ambulance Service of Cambridge Inc.: 1.9 → 13.8 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 13.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.25× in 2018

United Ambulance Service of Cambridge Inc.'s TCR rose 11.9 from 1.9 in 2016 to 13.8 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621910 · Cambridge, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.8 · 206% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #22/50
  • PHOTO San Francisco Opera…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: San Francisco Operations (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

United Ambulance Service of Cambridge Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows United Ambulance Service of Cambridge Inc. averages 7.8 TCR (206% of the Emergency medical transportation services, air or ground BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

United Ambulance Service of Cambridge Inc. TCR series: 2016=1.9 · 2018=13.8 · BLS 3.8

Where United Ambulance Service of Cambridge Inc. falls in its industry

976 Emergency medical transportati establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 50 Emergency medical transportati employers in Ohio.

United Ambulance Service of Cambridge Inc. (39 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 8.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate United Ambulance Service of Cambridge Inc.
United Ambulance Service of Cambridge Inc. (39 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 8.3

United Ambulance Service of Cambridge Inc. has fewer employees than the Emergency medical transportation service median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 13.8 2.0 7 0 0
2016 1.9 1.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621910 · OH · Cambridge

976 Emergency medical transportation services, air or ground employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 73 employers in Cambridge, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR San Francisco Operations 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Washington County/Johnson City EMS 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Greece Ambulance 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Iowa City IA 7.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE DRW PACKING INC 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE OHI Greenhouse LLC 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bridgewater Dairy LLC 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rossburg Facility 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR Southeastern Ohio Regional Medical Center. 701 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3816-SI3778 694 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3262 359 FTE
CITY-NEAR Quanex IG Systems Cambridge 351 FTE
NAT-TCR ABF Freight 050 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Schutt Reconditioning 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Esm Group Inc. - Casting Division 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Loews Regency San Francisco 7.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Linde - Arroyo 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Linde - Cartersville 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sioux Falls - 110 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Krosaki Magnesita Refractories 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.