Electric power distribution systems · Pennsylvania

United Electric Cooperative, Inc.

Dubois, PA · ~52 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.2
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

United Electric Cooperative, Inc. runs at 431% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric power distribution systems workplace, earning a grade F.

United Electric Cooperative, Inc.: 5.2 TCR = 431% of Electric power distribution systems BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

United Electric Cooperative, Inc. safety composite

United Electric Cooperative, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

United Electric Cooperative, Inc.: 4.0 → 5.2 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 20.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

United Electric Cooperative, Inc.'s TCR rose 1.2 from 4.0 in 2016 to 5.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 20.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Dubois, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.2 · 431% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #53/58
  • PHOTO PALMETTO CONSTRUCTION
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PALMETTO CONSTRUCTION (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

United Electric Cooperative, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows United Electric Cooperative, Inc. averages 5.2 TCR (431% of the Electric power distribution systems BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

United Electric Cooperative, Inc. TCR series: 2016=4 · 2017=0 · 2018=20.6 · 2019=4.1 · 2020=1.7 · 2021=3.6 · 2022=7.4 · 2023=0 · 2024=5.2 · BLS 1.2

Where United Electric Cooperative, Inc. falls in its industry

2,958 Electric power distribution sy establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #53 safest of 58 Electric power distribution sy employers in Pennsylvania.

United Electric Cooperative, Inc. (52 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate United Electric Cooperative, Inc.
United Electric Cooperative, Inc. (52 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

United Electric Cooperative, Inc. has fewer employees than the Electric power distribution systems median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.2 0.0 3 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 7.4 3.7 4 0 0
2021 3.6 1.8 2 0 0
2020 1.7 0.0 1 0 0
2019 4.1 2.1 2 0 0
2018 20.6 12.4 10 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 4.0 2.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · PA · Dubois

2,958 Electric power distribution systems employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 51 employers in Dubois, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PALMETTO CONSTRUCTION 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lebanon - Headquarters 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Virginia Public Utilities 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR DAVIS OFFICE (AS OF 7/15/2002) 5.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Farm 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Maitri Genetics 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Insa Shamokin Dam 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ethos Fairless Hills 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR Penn Highlands DuBois (West) 1,431 FTE
CITY-NEAR DuBois West Campus 1,120 FTE
CITY-NEAR Christ the King Manor Inc. 374 FTE
CITY-NEAR NOVO Health Services--DuBois 282 FTE
NAT-TCR Dahlonega 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Giant 237 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Wright Construction Company 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Reliable Paving 5.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bel Rae Senior Living 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE International Paper Fridley 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Orthman Conveying Systems 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Probi USA Redmond 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.