Boards, wood, resawing purchased lumber · Alabama

United Lumber & Reman, LLC

Muscle Shoals, AL · ~73 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

United Lumber & Reman, LLC runs at 114% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Boards, wood, resawing purchased lumber workplace, earning a grade C.

United Lumber & Reman, LLC: 3.8 TCR = 114% of Boards, wood, resawing purchased lumber BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

United Lumber & Reman, LLC safety composite

United Lumber & Reman, LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

United Lumber & Reman, LLC: 3.7 → 5.9 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 9.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.06× in 2023

United Lumber & Reman, LLC's TCR rose 2.3 from 3.7 in 2016 to 5.9 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 9.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.06× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321912 · Muscle Shoals, AL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.8 · 114% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #2/5
  • PHOTO Michaels Artistree 6…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~73 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Michaels Artistree 6500 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

United Lumber & Reman, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows United Lumber & Reman, LLC averages 3.8 TCR (114% of the Boards, wood, resawing purchased lumber BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

United Lumber & Reman, LLC TCR series: 2016=3.7 · 2018=0 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=1.3 · 2021=9.4 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=5.9 · BLS 3.3

Where United Lumber & Reman, LLC falls in its industry

178 Boards, wood, resawing purchas establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 5 Boards, wood, resawing purchas employers in Alabama.

United Lumber & Reman, LLC (73 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate United Lumber & Reman, LLC
United Lumber & Reman, LLC (73 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 5.1

United Lumber & Reman, LLC has more employees than the Boards, wood, resawing purchased lumber median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 5.9 4.0 6 0 0
2022 4.5 3.4 3 1 0
2021 9.4 8.1 6 1 0
2020 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2019 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.7 1.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321912 · AL · Muscle Shoals

178 Boards, wood, resawing purchased lumber employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 63 employers in Muscle Shoals, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Michaels Artistree 6500 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Conner Stilwell OK Plant 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Industrial Wood Products 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Michaels Artistree 6612 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE GGP Hatchery/Egg Depot (Elkmont) 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trussville Crew Headquarters 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trussville Crew Headquarters - APC 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE KBB Electrical Contractors LLC 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR North American Lighting - Muscle Shoals 1,616 FTE
CITY-NEAR NAL MUSCLE SHOALS PLANT 1,610 FTE
CITY-NEAR North American Lighting - Alabama 1,488 FTE
CITY-NEAR Constellium Muscle Shoals LLC - Alloys Operations 1,113 FTE
NAT-TCR Dominguez Farms 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR H.E. Williams, Inc. 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Haskins Steel 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Tambe Electric, Inc. 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bergey's Wholesale Parts 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Inmerr-O-D-Rw Merrillville 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sunderland Road #151 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE West Carthage #24 73 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.