Building cleaning services, janitorial · North Carolina

United Maintenance Corporation

Charlotte, NC · ~74 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

United Maintenance Corporation runs at 69% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Building cleaning services, janitorial workplace, earning a grade B.

United Maintenance Corporation: 3.1 TCR = 69% of Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

United Maintenance Corporation safety composite

United Maintenance Corporation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.0

2016→2021

United Maintenance Corporation injury rate improved

United Maintenance Corporation's TCR fell 6.0 from 6.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 6.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.0 · 2017=6.2 · 2018=2.7 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Charlotte, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.1 · 69% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #74/131
  • PHOTO QSI Pine Mountain
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~74 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: QSI Pine Mountain (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

United Maintenance Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows United Maintenance Corporation averages 3.1 TCR (69% of the Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

United Maintenance Corporation TCR series: 2016=6 · 2017=6.2 · 2018=2.7 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 4.5

Where United Maintenance Corporation falls in its industry

4,064 Building cleaning services, ja establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #74 safest of 131 Building cleaning services, ja employers in North Carolina.

United Maintenance Corporation (74 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate United Maintenance Corporation
United Maintenance Corporation (74 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

United Maintenance Corporation has more employees than the Building cleaning services, janitorial median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.8 3.8 3 0 0
2018 2.7 2.7 2 0 0
2017 6.2 4.7 4 0 0
2016 6.0 6.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · NC · Charlotte

4,064 Building cleaning services, janitorial employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR QSI Pine Mountain 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 0769-Schlumberger 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dallas College - EDUC 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR JAN-TX-HOU 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Worthington Farms 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE BLUE VIEW INC 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6271-508 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Baker Residential 74 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR WSL-Stateline 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Vista Quality - Piedras 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 105000-Washington Dc Po 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR All Service Plastic Molding, Inc. Falls Creek 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cattlemens Roseville 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Teknon Infrastructure Services, LLC 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Desoto Retirement 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Folktale Winery & Vineyards 74 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.