Asbestos abatement services · Idaho

United Metals Recycling - Boise

Boise, ID · ~32 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

United Metals Recycling - Boise runs at 142% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Asbestos abatement services workplace, earning a grade D.

United Metals Recycling - Boise: 3.7 TCR = 142% of Asbestos abatement services BLS 2.6 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

United Metals Recycling - Boise safety composite

United Metals Recycling - Boise scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2016→2024

United Metals Recycling - Boise injury rate improved

United Metals Recycling - Boise's TCR fell 1.1 from 3.4 in 2016 to 2.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 11.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.64× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.4 · 2017=11.8 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=6.4 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=3.0 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562910 · Boise, ID ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.7 · 142% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #5/5
  • PHOTO Coleman Upper Lake
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Coleman Upper Lake (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Idaho employers → · Look up another →

United Metals Recycling - Boise in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows United Metals Recycling - Boise averages 3.7 TCR (142% of the Asbestos abatement services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

United Metals Recycling - Boise TCR series: 2016=3.4 · 2017=11.8 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=6.4 · 2020=0 · 2021=3 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.3 · BLS 2.6

Where United Metals Recycling - Boise falls in its industry

672 Asbestos abatement services establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Idaho alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 5 Asbestos abatement services employers in Idaho.

United Metals Recycling - Boise (32 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 50 employees and a TCR of 1.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate United Metals Recycling - Boise
United Metals Recycling - Boise (32 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 50 employees and a TCR of 1.8

United Metals Recycling - Boise has fewer employees than the Asbestos abatement services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.4 0.0 1 0 0
2021 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 6.4 3.2 2 0 0
2018 3.8 3.8 1 0 0
2017 11.8 11.8 4 0 0
2016 3.4 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562910 · ID · Boise

672 Asbestos abatement services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,774 rated employers in Idaho with headcount on file · 581 employers in Boise, ID · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Coleman Upper Lake 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Hope 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR GAMA Contracting Services, Inc. 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR NRC Corporation: Massena 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nature Ridge Organic Dairy 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Logging job 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Paul Agronomy 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Atkinson's Mirror & Glass 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Luke's Boise Medical Center (Including MSTI) 10,034 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1-Boise Main Site 6,035 FTE
CITY-NEAR Micron Boise Site 5,184 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center 3,869 FTE
NAT-TCR BOXit Corp. 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Wildcat Construction Colorado 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Queensbury 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Baylor Heart and Vascular Center, L.L.P. 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Trimline 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE York County-Public Works-Utilities Operations 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fort Buchanan 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Melto Metal Products Company, Inc. 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.