Homes for the aged without nursing care · Pennsylvania

United Methodist Homes Tunkhannock Manor

Tunkhannock, PA · ~31 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
22.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

United Methodist Homes Tunkhannock Manor runs at 584% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Homes for the aged without nursing care workplace, earning a grade F.

United Methodist Homes Tunkhannock Manor: 22.2 TCR = 584% of Homes for the aged without nursing care BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

United Methodist Homes Tunkhannock Manor safety composite

United Methodist Homes Tunkhannock Manor scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

13/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 22.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 46.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

United Methodist Homes Tunkhannock Manor: 17.0 → 46.0 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 46.0 TCR · DART/TCR 2.07× in 2022

United Methodist Homes Tunkhannock Manor's TCR rose 29.0 from 17.0 in 2020 to 46.0 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 2.07× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Tunkhannock, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 22.2 · 584% of ind

  • DART 46.0 DART
  • RANK #228/233
  • PHOTO Quail Park Memory Ca…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Quail Park Memory Care Residences (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

United Methodist Homes Tunkhannock Manor in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows United Methodist Homes Tunkhannock Manor averages 22.2 TCR (584% of the Homes for the aged without nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

United Methodist Homes Tunkhannock Manor TCR series: 2020=17 · 2021=3.6 · 2022=46 · BLS 3.8

Where United Methodist Homes Tunkhannock Manor falls in its industry

6,510 Homes for the aged without nur establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #228 safest of 233 Homes for the aged without nur employers in Pennsylvania.

United Methodist Homes Tunkhannock Manor (31 employees, TCR 22.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate United Methodist Homes Tunkhannock Manor
United Methodist Homes Tunkhannock Manor (31 employees, TCR 22.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

United Methodist Homes Tunkhannock Manor has fewer employees than the Homes for the aged without nursing care median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 46.0 46.0 0 14 0
2021 3.6 3.6 0 1 0
2020 17.0 12.7 1 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · PA · Tunkhannock

6,510 Homes for the aged without nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 22 employers in Tunkhannock, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Quail Park Memory Care Residences 22.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Avita of Brunswick 22.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2248-60071 22.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Villagio of Broomfield 22.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Spawn Plant 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Caputo & Guest Mushrooms 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE COLSC Cocalico Service Center 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Phoenixville Service Building 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Procter & Gamble Paper Products Company Mehoopany Plant 1,786 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tunkhannock - 279 P G Warehouse Way 445 FTE
CITY-NEAR P&G Mehoopany - Rob Dean. (SMRU10451) 324 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tunkhannock (Tioga Str.) 324 FTE
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0791 Morrisville 22.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Nelson County Jail 22.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Wpax 0045 (Collins Ln - F) 22.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Rockland Marine Corp 22.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE NJ_Burlington_15 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Target Construction, Inc. 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corechem, Inc. 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE FPSS 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.