Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing · Connecticut

United Tool & Die

West Hartford, CT · ~88 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

United Tool & Die runs at 93% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

United Tool & Die: 3.1 TCR = 93% of Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

United Tool & Die safety composite

United Tool & Die scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

United Tool & Die: 1.7 → 2.6 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 6.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.85× in 2024

United Tool & Die's TCR rose 0.9 from 1.7 in 2016 to 2.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.85× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · West Hartford, CT AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.1 · 93% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #21/36
  • PHOTO HoneywellTN19
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~88 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HoneywellTN19 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

United Tool & Die in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows United Tool & Die averages 3.1 TCR (93% of the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

United Tool & Die TCR series: 2016=1.7 · 2017=3.1 · 2018=5.2 · 2019=6.6 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=1.2 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=2.6 · BLS 3.3

Where United Tool & Die falls in its industry

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 36 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb employers in Connecticut.

United Tool & Die (88 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate United Tool & Die
United Tool & Die (88 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

United Tool & Die has fewer employees than the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.6 2.6 2 0 0
2023 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2021 1.2 0.0 1 0 0
2020 2.9 1.9 3 0 0
2019 6.6 1.9 4 3 0
2018 5.2 2.1 4 1 0
2017 3.1 3.1 3 0 0
2016 1.7 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · CT · West Hartford

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 118 employers in West Hartford, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HoneywellTN19 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR FMI, Inc. 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR LMI - STC - FL 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation Johnstown PA (2185) 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE White Flower Farm Torrington 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Service Maintenance Company Inc 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Camsan Inc 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shawns Lawns Inc. 2021 88 FTE
CITY-NEAR Triumph Group 537 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legrand Wiremold West Hartford 524 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Hebrew Center for Health and Rehabilitation 437 FTE
CITY-NEAR Colt's Manufacturing Company LLC 425 FTE
NAT-TCR Getzen Company, Inc. 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Palmer Office 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Tec Labs Building 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Gilbank Construction, Inc. 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Corrado Construction Company LLC 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE West Carrollton 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE R+L Carriers - GBA 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE OBC, Inc. 88 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.