Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building · Ohio

Universal Contracting Corporation

Cincinnati, OH · ~47 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Universal Contracting Corporation runs at 59% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade B.

Universal Contracting Corporation: 1.7 TCR = 59% of Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Universal Contracting Corporation safety composite

Universal Contracting Corporation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2016→2024

Universal Contracting Corporation injury rate improved

Universal Contracting Corporation's TCR fell 2.5 from 4.6 in 2016 to 2.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.6 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=2.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Cincinnati, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 59% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #77/220
  • PHOTO Oregon
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Oregon (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Universal Contracting Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Universal Contracting Corporation averages 1.7 TCR (59% of the Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Universal Contracting Corporation TCR series: 2016=4.6 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.2 · BLS 2.9

Where Universal Contracting Corporation falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #77 safest of 220 Addition, alteration and renov employers in Ohio.

Universal Contracting Corporation (47 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Universal Contracting Corporation
Universal Contracting Corporation (47 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Universal Contracting Corporation has fewer employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation for- median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.2 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 4.6 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · OH · Cincinnati

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,513 employers in Cincinnati, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Oregon 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Henry Bros. Co. 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Catamount Constructors 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jenkins Services, Inc. 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gerber Farm Division 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE MDP Acquisition LLC 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Potemkin Industries, Inc. 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE 259-NiSource-Springfield OH 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center 17,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Operations 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain : Evendale, OH 7,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain Evendale OH 6,400 FTE
NAT-TCR Boltswitch, Inc. 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Mastrocola Trucking, Inc. 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Pedricktown 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Cust-O-Fab Beaumont 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hiller Pensacola 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crown Lift Trucks Lexington 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Edwards Cast Stone 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crown Lift Trucks Raleigh 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.