Lumber, softwood dimension, made from logs or bolts · Oregon

Universal Forest products plant 388

Mcminnville, OR · ~53 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Universal Forest products plant 388 runs at 67% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Lumber, softwood dimension, made from logs or bolts workplace, earning a grade B.

Universal Forest products plant 388: 2.2 TCR = 67% of Lumber, softwood dimension, made from logs or bolts BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Universal Forest products plant 388 safety composite

Universal Forest products plant 388 scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Universal Forest products plant 388: 0.0 → 3.9 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 3.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2020

Universal Forest products plant 388's TCR rose 3.9 from 0.0 in 2016 to 3.9 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321113 · Mcminnville, OR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 67% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/71
  • PHOTO Greenville Lumber
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~53 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Greenville Lumber (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Universal Forest products plant 388 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Universal Forest products plant 388 averages 2.2 TCR (67% of the Lumber, softwood dimension, made from logs or bolts BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Universal Forest products plant 388 TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=3.4 · 2018=0 · 2019=3.7 · 2020=3.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Universal Forest products plant 388 falls in its industry

905 Lumber, softwood dimension, ma establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 71 Lumber, softwood dimension, ma employers in Oregon.

Universal Forest products plant 388 (53 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Universal Forest products plant 388
Universal Forest products plant 388 (53 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Universal Forest products plant 388 has fewer employees than the Lumber, softwood dimension, made from lo median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 3.9 0.0 2 0 0
2019 3.7 3.7 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.4 1.7 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321113 · OR · Mcminnville

905 Lumber, softwood dimension, made from logs or bolts employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 94 employers in Mcminnville, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Greenville Lumber 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wilson Enterprises 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Scotch Gulf Lumber LLC subsidiary of Canfor Southern Pine 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR White Mountain Lumber 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Walter Wells & Sons LLC 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Noble Mountain Tree Farm 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Klamath Falls, OR 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sunwest One, Inc. dba SunWest Builders 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR Linfield College 943 FTE
CITY-NEAR WILLAMETTE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER 610 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cascade Steel Rolling Mills 400 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSS McMinnville 397 FTE
NAT-TCR Flint Hills bev - Manhattan 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Dyer 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Pio Decimo Center 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Michels Power- IA 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Oak Valley Middle School 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Conbraco Industries - Westville 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Addington Place of Lee's Summit 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Koenig Iorn Works Inc 53 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.