Skilled nursing facilities · North Carolina

Universal Health Care/King

Name: Universal Health Care/King Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

King, NC · ~88 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

A
Excellent Safety Record: 2.5
Avg TCR: 6.5
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Universal Health Care/King runs at 39% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade A.

Universal Health Care/King: 2.5 TCR = 39% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Universal Health Care/King safety composite

Universal Health Care/King scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): B 2.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers
DART rate: B 1.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Universal Health Care/King: 1.3 → 2.3 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 5.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.46× in 2023

Universal Health Care/King's TCR rose 1.1 from 1.3 in 2019 to 2.3 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 5.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.46× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · King, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 2.5 · 39% of ind

DART 1.2 DART
RANK #62/510
PHOTO Monroe Health & Reha…
BOOK 5y book
INJ 8 inj
SIZE ~88 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Monroe Health & Rehab Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

This site

2.5
Monroe Health

2.5
Sunset Park He

2.5
Buena Vida of

2.5
Amelia Manor N

2.5

What this shows Universal Health Care/King averages 2.5 TCR (39% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Universal Health Care/King TCR series: 2019=1.3 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=5.2 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.3 · BLS 6.5

Where Universal Health Care/King falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

Grade A

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #62 safest of 510 Skilled nursing facilities employers in North Carolina.

Universal Health Care/King (88 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Universal Health Care/King has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses
2023	2.3	1.2	2	0
2022	0.0	0.0	0	0
2021	5.2	0.0	2	1
2020	3.9	2.6	3	0
2019	1.3	1.3	1	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NC · King

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 17 employers in King, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Monroe Health & Rehab Center	CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA	2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Sunset Park Healthcare	SANTA MONICA, CA	2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Buena Vida of San Antonio	SAN ANTONIO, TX	2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Amelia Manor Nursing Home	LAFAYETTE, LA	2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Public Utilities	HENDERSONVILLE	88 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Bayliss Boatworks Inc.	WANCHESE	88 FTE
STATE-SIZE	BU 3434 - I-40_I-77 Statesville, NC	STATESVILLE	88 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Young and McQueen Grading Company Inc	BURNSVILLE	88 FTE
CITY-NEAR	WM 6789	King	315 FTE
CITY-NEAR	6789	King	281 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Village Care of King	King	136 FTE
CITY-NEAR	UHC King	King	89 FTE
NAT-TCR	Palmer Steel	Mcallen, TX	2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	Black's Valley Ag Supply	Durand, WI	2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	ToyotaLift NE - BET	Bethlehem, PA	2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	Breinigsville Pa Plant	Breinigsville, PA	2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Camsan Inc	Stamford, CT	88 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Kite Pharma US, Oceanside	Oceanside, CA	88 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Kalco Machine & Mfg. Co.	Wichita Falls, TX	88 FTE
NAT-SIZE	C6-GA	Atlanta, GA	88 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.