Novelties, not specified elsewhere, manufacturing · Wisconsin

Universal Presentation Concepts, Inc.

Madison, WI · ~45 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Universal Presentation Concepts, Inc. runs at 162% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Novelties, not specified elsewhere, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Universal Presentation Concepts, Inc.: 5.3 TCR = 162% of Novelties, not specified elsewhere, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Universal Presentation Concepts, Inc. safety composite

Universal Presentation Concepts, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Universal Presentation Concepts, Inc.: 2.1 → 5.3 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 8.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Universal Presentation Concepts, Inc.'s TCR rose 3.2 from 2.1 in 2018 to 5.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 8.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339999 · Madison, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.3 · 162% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #14/16
  • PHOTO FURHAVEN PET PRODUCTS
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~45 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FURHAVEN PET PRODUCTS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Universal Presentation Concepts, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Universal Presentation Concepts, Inc. averages 5.3 TCR (162% of the Novelties, not specified elsewhere, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Universal Presentation Concepts, Inc. TCR series: 2018=2.1 · 2021=8.7 · 2023=5.3 · 2024=5.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Universal Presentation Concepts, Inc. falls in its industry

281 Novelties, not specified elsew establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 16 Novelties, not specified elsew employers in Wisconsin.

Universal Presentation Concepts, Inc. (45 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Universal Presentation Concepts, Inc.
Universal Presentation Concepts, Inc. (45 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Universal Presentation Concepts, Inc. has fewer employees than the Novelties, not specified elsewhere, manu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.3 0.0 2 0 0
2023 5.3 0.0 2 0 0
2021 8.7 5.8 3 0 0
2018 2.1 2.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339999 · WI · Madison

281 Novelties, not specified elsewhere, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 577 employers in Madison, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FURHAVEN PET PRODUCTS 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR EMD Millipore-75 Wiggins 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Scentsy SC 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Meissner Corporation 5.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Denmark Dairy LLC 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plover #205 Farms 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Babcock, WI Receiving Station 45 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary's Hospital - Madison 2,401 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meriter Hospital 2,249 FTE
CITY-NEAR EatStreet 1,659 FTE
CITY-NEAR TDS - Junction Road (All Employees) 1,302 FTE
NAT-TCR Couts Heating and Cooling 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 403 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Thorne Ready Mix Plant 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Modern routes 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Value Added Packaging, Inc. 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Graft Electric, Inc 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marklund Philip Center 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fabsco Fin-Air, LLC. 45 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.