Milk, fluid (except canned), manufacturing · New York

Upstate Niagara Cooperative Inc - Rochester

Rochester, NY · ~172 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Upstate Niagara Cooperative Inc - Rochester runs at 345% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Milk, fluid (except canned), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Upstate Niagara Cooperative Inc - Rochester: 11.4 TCR = 345% of Milk, fluid (except canned), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Upstate Niagara Cooperative Inc - Rochester safety composite

Upstate Niagara Cooperative Inc - Rochester scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2022→2024

Upstate Niagara Cooperative Inc - Rochester injury rate improved

Upstate Niagara Cooperative Inc - Rochester's TCR fell 0.8 from 10.8 in 2022 to 10.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 13.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.88× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=10.8 · 2023=13.4 · 2024=10.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311511 · Rochester, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 11.4 · 345% of ind

  • DART 10.0 DART
  • RANK #41/43
  • PHOTO Hiland Dairy Omaha P…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 54 inj
  • SIZE ~172 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hiland Dairy Omaha Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Upstate Niagara Cooperative Inc - Rochester in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Upstate Niagara Cooperative Inc - Rochester averages 11.4 TCR (345% of the Milk, fluid (except canned), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Upstate Niagara Cooperative Inc - Rochester TCR series: 2022=10.8 · 2023=13.4 · 2024=10 · BLS 3.3

Where Upstate Niagara Cooperative Inc - Rochester falls in its industry

457 Milk, fluid (except canned), m establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #41 safest of 43 Milk, fluid (except canned), m employers in New York.

Upstate Niagara Cooperative Inc - Rochester (172 employees, TCR 11.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 140 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Upstate Niagara Cooperative Inc - Rochester
Upstate Niagara Cooperative Inc - Rochester (172 employees, TCR 11.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 140 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Upstate Niagara Cooperative Inc - Rochester has more employees than the Milk, fluid (except canned), manufacturi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.0 10.0 16 0 0
2023 13.4 11.6 22 0 0
2022 10.8 9.5 16 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311511 · NY · Rochester

457 Milk, fluid (except canned), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 956 employers in Rochester, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hiland Dairy Omaha Plant 11.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR HP Hood, LLC- Barre, VT 11.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Royal Crest Dairy, Inc 11.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prairie Farms Dairy 11.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dale Rd 172 FTE
STATE-SIZE Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics 172 FTE
STATE-SIZE Optimation Technology, Inc 172 FTE
STATE-SIZE Century Mold-TN 172 FTE
CITY-NEAR Division 50 University of Rochester 13,244 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rochester General Hospital 7,833 FTE
CITY-NEAR Division 40 University of Rochester 4,884 FTE
CITY-NEAR Unity Hospital 3,158 FTE
NAT-TCR The Medical Center at Franklin 11.4 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Grinnell 11.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sl Snf, LLC 11.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Wieland Forgeworks 11.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Alaris Health at West Orange 172 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sea Fox Boats 172 FTE
NAT-SIZE USA - Franklin Park, Seymour Ave 172 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eastgate 172 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.