Industrial building (except warehouses) construction · Tennessee

Uranium Processng Facility (UPF) (EPC Work)

Oak Ridge, TN · ~1,250 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.2
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Uranium Processng Facility (UPF) (EPC Work) runs at 7% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Industrial building (except warehouses) construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Uranium Processng Facility (UPF) (EPC Work): 0.2 TCR = 7% of Industrial building (except warehouses) construction BLS 2.9 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Uranium Processng Facility (UPF) (EPC Work) safety composite

Uranium Processng Facility (UPF) (EPC Work) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Uranium Processng Facility (UPF) (EPC Work) held a steady TCR band

Uranium Processng Facility (UPF) (EPC Work)'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.2 in 2023 to 0.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 0.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=0.2 · 2024=0.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236210 · Oak Ridge, TN AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.2 · 7% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/17
  • PHOTO Smock Fansler Corpor…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~1,250 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Smock Fansler Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Uranium Processng Facility (UPF) (EPC Work) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Uranium Processng Facility (UPF) (EPC Work) averages 0.2 TCR (7% of the Industrial building (except warehouses) construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Uranium Processng Facility (UPF) (EPC Work) TCR series: 2023=0.2 · 2024=0.2 · BLS 2.9

Where Uranium Processng Facility (UPF) (EPC Work) falls in its industry

924 Industrial building (except wa establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 17 Industrial building (except wa employers in Tennessee.

Uranium Processng Facility (UPF) (EPC Work) (1,250 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Uranium Processng Facility (UPF) (EPC Work)
Uranium Processng Facility (UPF) (EPC Work) (1,250 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Uranium Processng Facility (UPF) (EPC Work) has more employees than the Industrial building (except warehouses) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.2 0.0 4 0 0
2023 0.2 0.1 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236210 · TN · Oak Ridge

924 Industrial building (except warehouses) construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 107 employers in Oak Ridge, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Smock Fansler Corporation 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1001 - Zachry Home Office 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Infinity Maintenance Services, LP 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR ADM Decatur Illinois 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE CMH Homes, Inc. 1,242 FTE
STATE-SIZE NASHVILLE FIRE DEPARTMENT 1,242 FTE
STATE-SIZE eviCore - Franklin 1,262 FTE
STATE-SIZE NAS-National Aerospace Solutions at AEDC 1,263 FTE
CITY-NEAR UCOR 1,817 FTE
CITY-NEAR Uranium Processing Facility (UPF) EPC Work) 1,637 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1969-MMC1 1,180 FTE
CITY-NEAR METHODIST MEDICAL CENTER 913 FTE
NAT-TCR Fort Worth Tx Office 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Womack Machine Supply Co Farmers Branch 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Pfg Precision Optics 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Equistar chemicals, L.P. (Victoria Plant) 0.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Memorial Hospital of Carbondale 1,250 FTE
NAT-SIZE Elkton, VA Facility 1,250 FTE
NAT-SIZE Farmington Public Schools 1,251 FTE
NAT-SIZE OAK-INFLIGHT 1,249 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.