Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · Minnesota

Urban Logistics LLC

Eagan, MN · ~375 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
10.8
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Urban Logistics LLC runs at 166% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade D.

Urban Logistics LLC: 10.8 TCR = 166% of Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Urban Logistics LLC safety composite

Urban Logistics LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
C 3.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−13.9

2022→2023

Urban Logistics LLC injury rate improved

Urban Logistics LLC's TCR fell 13.9 from 17.7 in 2022 to 3.9 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 17.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=17.7 · 2023=3.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Eagan, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 10.8 · 166% of ind

  • DART 3.9 DART
  • RANK #77/113
  • PHOTO Smile Logistics, LLC
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~375 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Smile Logistics, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Urban Logistics LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Urban Logistics LLC averages 10.8 TCR (166% of the Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Urban Logistics LLC TCR series: 2022=17.7 · 2023=3.9 · BLS 6.5

Where Urban Logistics LLC falls in its industry

6,679 Express delivery services (exc establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #77 safest of 113 Express delivery services (exc employers in Minnesota.

Urban Logistics LLC (375 employees, TCR 10.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Urban Logistics LLC
Urban Logistics LLC (375 employees, TCR 10.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Urban Logistics LLC has more employees than the Express delivery services (except establ median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.9 3.9 3 0 0
2022 17.7 17.7 7 6 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · MN · Eagan

6,679 Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 285 employers in Eagan, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Smile Logistics, LLC 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR ADRIAN (MIADR) 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR NCGOO - GREENSBORO HIB 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR SCSMT - SUMTER CENTER 10.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Owatonna Hospital 375 FTE
STATE-SIZE District Center Floating Employees 376 FTE
STATE-SIZE Minnesota DC7 377 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 1470 373 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prime Therapeutics - Prime Landing & Remote 6,596 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thomson Reuters - Eagan 4,474 FTE
CITY-NEAR MSPXL0001 MSPXL0001 4,156 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lifeworks Services, Inc 3,663 FTE
NAT-TCR Stop & Shop 100606 10.8 TCR
NAT-TCR CSL Green Bay LLC dba Brookview Meadows 10.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Bloomer Healthcare, LLC 10.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Cadence at Garner 10.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Terra Bella Health and Wellness Suites 375 FTE
NAT-SIZE Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Lakeway 375 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aurora Medical Center Hartford 375 FTE
NAT-SIZE Inc Village of Freeport 375 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.