Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing · Ohio

Urbana - Honeywell Aerospace

Urbana, OH · ~445 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Urbana - Honeywell Aerospace runs at 7% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Urbana - Honeywell Aerospace: 0.2 TCR = 7% of Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Urbana - Honeywell Aerospace safety composite

Urbana - Honeywell Aerospace scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2022→2023

Urbana - Honeywell Aerospace injury rate improved

Urbana - Honeywell Aerospace's TCR fell 0.5 from 0.5 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 0.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=0.5 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Urbana, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.2 · 7% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/37
  • PHOTO B/E Aerospace, Inc. …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~445 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: B/E Aerospace, Inc. (New Berlin WI) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Urbana - Honeywell Aerospace in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Urbana - Honeywell Aerospace averages 0.2 TCR (7% of the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Urbana - Honeywell Aerospace TCR series: 2022=0.5 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Urbana - Honeywell Aerospace falls in its industry

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 37 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb employers in Ohio.

Urbana - Honeywell Aerospace (445 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Urbana - Honeywell Aerospace
Urbana - Honeywell Aerospace (445 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Urbana - Honeywell Aerospace has more employees than the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.5 0.2 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · OH · Urbana

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 50 employers in Urbana, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR B/E Aerospace, Inc. (New Berlin WI) 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR LORD Corporation - Dayton 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Systems : UD EPISCenter 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR ACSS L3 COMMUNICATIONS TCAS LLC 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE PAC Worldwide Middletown 445 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sugar Creek Packing Company Dayton Campus 444 FTE
STATE-SIZE ABC INOAC Exterior Systems, LLC. Fremont 444 FTE
STATE-SIZE Loc Performance - St Marys 444 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rittal North America LLC 602 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nelson Tree Service LLC 555 FTE
CITY-NEAR Honeywell Aerospace - Urbana 481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nelson Tree Service, LLC 460 473 FTE
NAT-TCR AUSBTXIB 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR RDMDWAMF 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Southwire Heflin 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR DuPont - Tralee Park 0.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Indianapolis in (Gatorade) 445 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clark Construction Group CA LP 445 FTE
NAT-SIZE SIE - San Diego - Scranton 445 FTE
NAT-SIZE GA.TUCKE.9 - Ricoh Usa, Inc 445 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.