Ducts, sheet metal, manufacturing · Michigan

Urgent Design and Manufacturing

Lapeer, MI · ~250 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Urgent Design and Manufacturing runs at 142% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Ducts, sheet metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Urgent Design and Manufacturing: 4.7 TCR = 142% of Ducts, sheet metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Urgent Design and Manufacturing safety composite

Urgent Design and Manufacturing scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.7

2016→2024

Urgent Design and Manufacturing injury rate improved

Urgent Design and Manufacturing's TCR fell 5.7 from 8.8 in 2016 to 3.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 8.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.8 · 2017=3.8 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=5.0 · 2021=7.4 · 2022=5.0 · 2023=2.1 · 2024=3.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332322 · Lapeer, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.7 · 142% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #27/53
  • PHOTO BSM NORTH
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 111 inj
  • SIZE ~250 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: BSM NORTH (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Urgent Design and Manufacturing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Urgent Design and Manufacturing averages 4.7 TCR (142% of the Ducts, sheet metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Urgent Design and Manufacturing TCR series: 2016=8.8 · 2017=3.8 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=5 · 2021=7.4 · 2022=5 · 2023=2.1 · 2024=3.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Urgent Design and Manufacturing falls in its industry

1,158 Ducts, sheet metal, manufactur establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #27 safest of 53 Ducts, sheet metal, manufactur employers in Michigan.

Urgent Design and Manufacturing (250 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Urgent Design and Manufacturing
Urgent Design and Manufacturing (250 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Urgent Design and Manufacturing has more employees than the Ducts, sheet metal, manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.1 2.2 10 0 0
2023 2.1 0.9 7 0 0
2022 5.0 2.6 21 0 0
2021 7.4 2.9 23 0 0
2020 5.0 1.6 9 0 0
2019 4.8 0.0 10 0 0
2018 2.2 2.2 4 0 0
2017 3.8 3.0 9 0 0
2016 8.8 3.9 18 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332322 · MI · Lapeer

1,158 Ducts, sheet metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 54 employers in Lapeer, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR BSM NORTH 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Royston LLC - Jasper, GA 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Genesee Global Group 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sabina 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Maroa Farms 250 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cadillac Asphalt LLC 250 FTE
STATE-SIZE OPC Arbre Farms, LLC 250 FTE
STATE-SIZE Magna Powertrain Shelby Township 250 FTE
CITY-NEAR McLaren Lapeer Region 832 FTE
CITY-NEAR KAMAX Inc. Lapeer Facility 477 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kamax Inc. 443 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lapeer County Medical Care Facility 377 FTE
NAT-TCR Hou-Technical Operations 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Marion Body Works 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR InterMed Marginal Way 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Big R of Trinidad, Inc. 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rosewood 250 FTE
NAT-SIZE Commercial 250 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kyana Commercial Interiors LLC 250 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1 Priority Environmental Services 250 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.