Trusses, wood roof or floor, manufacturing · Arizona

US Components LLC

Tucson, AZ · ~57 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

US Components LLC runs at 247% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Trusses, wood roof or floor, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

US Components LLC: 8.2 TCR = 247% of Trusses, wood roof or floor, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

US Components LLC safety composite

US Components LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2016→2024

US Components LLC injury rate improved

US Components LLC's TCR fell 2.3 from 8.4 in 2016 to 6.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 16.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.19× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.4 · 2017=7.3 · 2018=5.7 · 2019=10.7 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=5.1 · 2022=11.7 · 2023=16.6 · 2024=6.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321214 · Tucson, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.2 · 247% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #8/14
  • PHOTO Bear Truss - St. Louis
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 39 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bear Truss - St. Louis (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

US Components LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows US Components LLC averages 8.2 TCR (247% of the Trusses, wood roof or floor, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

US Components LLC TCR series: 2016=8.4 · 2017=7.3 · 2018=5.7 · 2019=10.7 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=5.1 · 2022=11.7 · 2023=16.6 · 2024=6.1 · BLS 3.3

Where US Components LLC falls in its industry

421 Trusses, wood roof or floor, m establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 14 Trusses, wood roof or floor, m employers in Arizona.

US Components LLC (57 employees, TCR 8.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 7.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate US Components LLC
US Components LLC (57 employees, TCR 8.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 7.0

US Components LLC has more employees than the Trusses, wood roof or floor, manufacturi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.1 1.5 4 0 0
2023 16.6 7.4 9 0 0
2022 11.7 1.9 6 0 0
2021 5.1 3.4 3 0 0
2020 1.9 0.0 1 0 0
2019 10.7 4.3 5 0 0
2018 5.7 3.8 3 0 0
2017 7.3 1.8 3 1 0
2016 8.4 5.0 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321214 · AZ · Tucson

421 Trusses, wood roof or floor, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 1,150 employers in Tucson, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bear Truss - St. Louis 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 32-256951285-2 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Seminole Trusses Inc. 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shelby AL Wood Truss 8.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Metro Water District 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eagle Mountain Construcgtion 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Juarez contracting 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE VSS International, Inc. Arizona Construction 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Arizona 18,951 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Airport Site 9,878 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tucson Medical Center 4,407 FTE
CITY-NEAR U.S. Border Patrol Sector - Tucson 3,989 FTE
NAT-TCR Builders Concrete & Supply, Inc. 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Veranda Marine 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR University of Chicago 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Pember Companies, Inc. 8.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Maxcess - Tidland Keene NH 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Apples (Sheffield) 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE C3 Environmental Specialties Lp 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale North Naples 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.